Please send or post your R code. On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 10:35 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think I was the source of this expectation. > > And I also think I was wrong. > > I just did some experiments myself in R and random cut vectors seem to work > about as well as non-random ones for positive orthant vectors. For oddly > distributed vectors, it still might be good to use difference vectors as a > basis for LSH, but I am much less convinced than before. > > On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 8:54 PM, Lance Norskog <goks...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Test data: 1000 random vectors as samples. All values 0->1, linear >> distribution. >> This test data gives no negative cosine distances, and so all bits are >> 0. This is expected (from previous mail threads). >> >
-- Lance Norskog goks...@gmail.com
