Correction: I didn't mean to re-implement the existing functionality, but there should be an easy way to connect UAC with Taste evaluators.
On 28 July 2011 12:57, Marko Ciric <ciric.ma...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think it wouldn't be a big problem to reimplement it thought it would > have to have a sort of wrapper around the existing evaluator (it would > require to evaluate multiple times for a single user, having different > relevant items I think). > > > On 26 July 2011 01:35, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Well, we do have numerous ways to compute AUC. I don't think that they >> are >> integrated into the recommendation evaluation framework yet. Would you >> like >> to take on the application of suitable glue? >> >> >> On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Marko Ciric <ciric.ma...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> > Is there a plan to include this in Mahout in some future release? >> > >> > On 25 July 2011 17:20, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > > That would allow you to compute AUC which might be useful. AUC is the >> > > probability that a relevant (purchased) item is ranked higher than a >> > > non-relevant item. >> > > >> > > On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 3:16 AM, Marko Ciric <ciric.ma...@gmail.com> >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > > The better way to do it is to implement an evaluator which accepts >> the >> > > > collection of items that are relevant. >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > -- >> > Marko Ćirić >> > ciric.ma...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > > -- > -- > Marko Ćirić > ciric.ma...@gmail.com > > -- -- Marko Ćirić ciric.ma...@gmail.com
