Thanks! I actually didn't know you can do that. :)

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Johannes Schulte <johannes.schu...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> dataPoints can be in memory or from disk, and you can sample the dataPoints
> for initialClusters.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:16 PM, Johannes Schulte <
> johannes.schu...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > this worked for me without having to fiddle with map reduce classes
> >
> >  List<Cluster> initialClusters = new ArrayList<Cluster>();
> >
> >         Iterable<Vector> dataPoints = Lists.newArrayList();
> >
> >
> >         ClusterClassifier prior =
> >
> >                 new ClusterClassifier(initialClusters,
> >
> >                         new KMeansClusteringPolicy(0.01));
> >
> >
> >         ClusterClassifier clustered =
> newClusterIterator().iterate(dataPoints, prior, 10);
> >
> >         List<Cluster> finalClusters = clustered.getModels();
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Dan Filimon <dangeorge.fili...@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Apologies for not getting back to you more quickly!
> >>
> >> You can use Mahout KMeansDriver and have it run locally (so not as a
> >> MapReduce, but locally).
> >> There's a static method KMeansDriver.run() whose last argument is
> >> runSequential. You need to set this to true.
> >>
> >> The thing is it will still read and write the vectors to disk. Is this
> >> okay?
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > This seems surprising.
> >> >
> >> > I don't think we removed it.
> >> >
> >> > Does anybody know better than I?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Ahmet Ylmaz <
> >> ahmetyilmazefe...@yahoo.com
> >> > >wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Hi,
> >> > >
> >> > > It seems to be that in-memory kmeans clustering is removed from
> Mahout
> >> > 0.7.
> >> > >
> >> > > Does this mean that it is no longer possible to do in-memory kmeans
> >> > > clustering with Mahout?
> >> > > Or, is Hadoop based kmeans clustering the only option?
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > Ahmet
> >> > >
> >> >
> >>
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to