Using this list to discuss is very convenient to stay tuned, so no objection.
Peng Zhang -- Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 10, 2014, at 12:16 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: > > No Jira yet. There are too many moving parts and we’d have to see if it’s > appropriate for Mahout inclusion or as an “example” project. It would be > great to include but we’ll have to see what others think as it takes better > form. All components should be Apache license compatible though. > > I’ll start a Github project. Does anyone object to using this list for > discussion? > > On Sep 9, 2014, at 8:46 AM, Saikat Kanjilal <sxk1...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > @Pat Any interest in using http://vertx.io instead of play, have heard some > really good perf stats around this > > We should really start a jira with a list of use cases and then back into a > tech stack and outline the design in jira, thoughts ? > > Sent from my iPhone > >> On Sep 9, 2014, at 8:44 AM, "Martin, Nick" <nimar...@pssd.com> wrote: >> >> Would absolutely love an ES integration. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Pat Ferrel [mailto:p...@occamsmachete.com] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014 10:29 AM >> To: user@mahout.apache.org >> Subject: New Mahout Recommender Service >> >> Now that we have the basis of several significant improvements to Mahout's >> recommender it seems like we need to go the last step and provide a service. >> Without this it is left to the user to do a lot of integration making the >> current next gen somewhat incomplete. >> >> Using the Hadoop mapreduce code you can get all recs for all people using >> collaborative filtering data or you can use the in-memory single machine >> recommender if you have a small dataset. >> >> The next generation would require Solr or Elasticsearch so why not go the >> extra step and provide a recommender API on top? At very least it would give >> users a single machine API they can call, analogous to the in-memory >> recommender of Mahout 0.9. But it would also be indefinitely scalable. >> >> Is anyone interested in discussing this here? >
