+1 (binding)
Verified hashes and signatures; distribution sources tarball and zip unpack
well, build passes from unpacked sources.
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Andrew Musselman <
andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Verified tests pass for src tarball and zip; I'm comfortable skipping EMR
> smoke testing for a point release given team opinion that it's not
> required.
>
> On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Ran (on Hadoop 2.4.1 + spark 1.2.1) all examples with all options in the
> > |.tar.gz| binary archive in pseudo-cluster mode and one with
> > MAHOUT_LOCAL=true with only the previously noted minor data issue, which
> I
> > agree can wait for the next release.
> >
> > Ran a mix and match of the |.zip| binary archive examples with
> > MAHOUT_LOCAL=true and in pseudo-cluster mode without issue.
> >
> > Tested the shell from both archives for qr and matrix display fixes.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 05/31/2015 12:09 PM, Pat Ferrel wrote:
> >
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> Verified on Spark 1.3 psuedo-clustered HDFS 2.4
> >>
> >> There are some cleanup of example data issues that can wait for next
> >> release.
> >>
> >>
> >> On May 30, 2015, at 8:16 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Verified locally build and tests for {source} * {zip, tar}. No issues
> >> found.
> >>
> >> +1 (binding)
> >>
> >> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 11:14 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Andrew Palumbo / Dmitriy: Please also verify the various scenarios as
> >>> described in M-1693
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 10:32 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Here's the new 0.10.1 Release Candidate
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1009/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.10.1/
> >>>>
> >>>> The Voting ends on Sunday, May 31 2015.
> >>>>
> >>>> Need a +1 from the PMC for each of the line items below for the
> release
> >>>> to pass.
> >>>>
> >>>> 1. Ted/Grant: Verify hashes and checksums - {binary,source} x
> {zip,tar}
> >>>> + pom
> >>>>
> >>>> 2. AKM: Verify examples on EMR - {binary, source} * {zip, tar}
> >>>>
> >>>> 3. Andrew Palumbo: Verify examples locally - {binary} * {zip, tar}
> >>>>
> >>>> 4. Suneel: Verify build and tests - {source} * {zip, tar}
> >>>>
> >>>> 5. Pat: Verify examples locally - {source} * {zip, tar}
> >>>>
> >>>> The LICENSE and NOTICE files have not been updated this time and will
> be
> >>>> addressed in future releases.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 8:32 PM, Suneel Marthi <
> suneel.mar...@gmail.com
> >>>> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Please hold ur votes, will be refreshing staging with another build
> in
> >>>>> the next hour
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Andrew Musselman <
> >>>>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Likewise source zip and tarballs build and pass tests.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Verified {source} * {zip, tar} and all tests pass.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +1 (binding)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Sat, May 30, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Suneel Marthi <smar...@apache.org
> >
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is a call for VOTE to pass Mahout 0.10.1 release candidate
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> that's
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> available at
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1008/org/apache/mahout/mahout-distribution/0.10.1/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Need atleast 3 PMC +1 (binding) votes to cut the release
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Below are the tasks breakdown for the PMC and committers:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Andy Palumbo & Pat Ferrel: verify the binary artifacts and run
> tests
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Suneel & AKM: verify the src artifacts
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Ted/Grant/Drew: verify the hashes and Sigs
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The LICENSE.txt and NOTICE.txt still need to be updated and will
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> not be
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> addressed as part of 0.10.1 release.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >
>
