Anyhow, I'm +1 for removing MAHOUT_LOCAL, but I believe the deprecated MapReduce-based code still makes sense if it is running well on Ignite.
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 8:20 AM, David Starina <david.star...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone tried to run the deprecated MapReduce code on Ignite? Is the > performance improvement good enough to reconsider leaving those algorithms > in Mahout? > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Andrew Musselman < > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Yes I agree; will leave the question open a couple days. >> >> On Sunday, March 20, 2016, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote: >> >> > Maybe a better user question is: How many people are still using the >> > deprecated Hadoop code? >> > >> > If the number is small +1 for removal. >> > >> > On Mar 20, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Andrew Musselman < >> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > To clarify, the MAHOUT_LOCAL option only works for legacy Hadoop >> > MapReduce-based jobs which officially became deprecated in 0.10.0. >> > >> > On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Musselman < >> > andrew.mussel...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> > > Yes as I understand it. >> > > >> > > >> > > On Sunday, March 20, 2016, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > >> > >> Are we just talking about Hadoop Mapreduce? I thought is was ignored >> > when >> > >> using Spark. >> > >> >> > >> On Mar 20, 2016, at 8:20 AM, alok tanna <tannaa...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> -1 MAHOUT_LOCAL is very useful for quick POC . >> > >> >> > >> Thanks, >> > >> Alok Tanna >> > >> Sent from my iPhone >> > >> >> > >>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 5:01 AM, Mihai Dascalu <mihai.dasc...@cs.pub.ro >> > <javascript:;>> >> > >> wrote: >> > >>> >> > >>> -1 I still use it for fast deployment and it’s really helpful for >> small >> > >> local processing >> > >>> >> > >>> Have a great weekend! >> > >>> Mihai >> > >>> >> > >>>> On 20 Mar 2016, at 06:13, Suneel Marthi <suneel.mar...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> >> > >> wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >>>> +1 to remove this >> > >>>> >> > >>>> Sent from my iPhone >> > >>>> >> > >>>>> On Mar 20, 2016, at 12:01 AM, Andrew Musselman < >> > >> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> We're discussing removing the MAHOUT_LOCAL option in order to trim >> > >> artifact >> > >>>>> sizes. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> If you think keeping the option to use MAHOUT_LOCAL for testing >> with >> > >> the >> > >>>>> single-node mode of Hadoop is important please let us know. It >> can be >> > >> handy >> > >>>>> for trying things out but it would be nice to ditch the effort >> > >> required to >> > >>>>> maintain it. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-1705 for more >> > >> context. >> > >>>>> >> > >>>>> Thanks! >> > >>> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > >> > >
