This vote has been cancelled due to issues found while testing..  RC2 will be 
out soon.

________________________________
From: Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com>
Sent: Friday, March 3, 2017 4:19:51 PM
To: d...@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

scratch that, anyone using sbt use the following resolver:

    resolvers += “Apache Staging" at 
"https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1034 
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1034>”


On Mar 3, 2017, at 10:41 AM, Pat Ferrel <p...@occamsmachete.com> wrote:

My first observation is that the typical way to release Scala libs is with 
multiple versions for the currently popular Scalas. Akka for instance is not 
stable with Scala 2.10 anymore so consider it deprecated and it is the core of 
Spark. Many libs release 2.10 and 2.11 versions of binaries with many already 
on 2.12 also. Mixing versions is a much bigger deal than with Java and the most 
common version for current development seems to be 2.11.

There appear to be ways to mix versions in your builds but it is somewhat more 
complex and not guaranteed to work. 
http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/core/binary-compatibility-of-scala-releases.html
 
<http://docs.scala-lang.org/overviews/core/binary-compatibility-of-scala-releases.html>

On a separate note to test in the future it would facilitate things if the 
maven or sbt snippets were included to test the staging repo.

I assume sbt is:


scalaVersion := “2.10.4”

val mahoutVersion = “0.13.0"

resolvers += “Apache Staging" at 
"https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache 
<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache><https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
 <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache>>”

// Mahout's Spark libs
"org.apache.mahout" %% "mahout-math-scala" % mahoutVersion,
"org.apache.mahout" %% "mahout-spark" % mahoutVersion,
"org.apache.mahout"  % "mahout-math" % mahoutVersion,
"org.apache.mahout"  % "mahout-hdfs" % mahoutVersion,


BTW I’ve compiled Mahout locally with Scala 2.11 so it may just be a case for 
someone having time to update the release process.

I’ll try to test today.



On Mar 3, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com 
<mailto:ap....@outlook.com>> wrote:





Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/02/2017 10:17 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: d...@mahout.apache.org
Cc: user@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate

Confirmed hashes and sigs, tested operations in the shell in src and bin
artifacts. Would like someone else to check sigs too.

+1 (binding)

On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:39 PM, Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com
> wrote:

> New RC for 0.13.0 release out; please try out the new artifacts at
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1034 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1034> 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1034 
> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-1034>>
>
> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on Friday,
> March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes (whichever
> occurs earlier).  Please download, test and vote with
>
> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout,
> because...
>
> The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 11:45 AM, Andrew Palumbo <ap....@outlook.com 
> <mailto:ap....@outlook.com>>
> wrote:
>
>> I will verify keys tonight.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com 
>> <mailto:andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>>
>> Date: 03/01/2017 10:20 AM (GMT-08:00)
>> To: user@mahout.apache.org <mailto:user@mahout.apache.org>, 
>> d...@mahout.apache.org <mailto:d...@mahout.apache.org>
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache Mahout 0.13.0 Release Candidate
>>
>> Nevermind, that was before building the src distro.
>>
>> Shell works fine with src and binary distros.
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Andrew Musselman <
>> andrew.mussel...@gmail.com <mailto:andrew.mussel...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm getting this when starting the spark-shell on a Mac:
>>>
>>> Loading /Users/andrew.musselman/Downloads/mahout-testing/
>>> apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0/bin/load-shell.scala...
>>> <console>:36: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
>>>       import org.apache.mahout.math._
>>>                         ^
>>> <console>:19: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
>>>       import org.apache.mahout.math.scalabindings._
>>>                         ^
>>> <console>:19: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
>>>       import org.apache.mahout.math.drm._
>>>                         ^
>>> <console>:19: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
>>>       import org.apache.mahout.math.scalabindings.RLikeOps._
>>>                         ^
>>> <console>:19: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
>>>       import org.apache.mahout.math.drm.RLikeDrmOps._
>>>                         ^
>>> <console>:19: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
>>>       import org.apache.mahout.sparkbindings._
>>>                         ^
>>> <console>:21: error: object mahout is not a member of package org.apache
>>>       implicit val sdc: org.apache.mahout.sparkbinding
>> s.SparkDistributedContext
>>> = sc2sdc(sc)
>>>                                    ^
>>> <console>:21: error: not found: value sc2sdc
>>>       implicit val sdc: org.apache.mahout.sparkbinding
>> s.SparkDistributedContext
>>> = sc2sdc(sc)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org 
>>> <mailto:a...@apache.org>>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've confirmed hashes and sigs; if someone other than me could confirm
>>>> all three sigs it'd be good, e.g.:
>>>>
>>>> `gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0-src.tar.gz.asc`
>>>> `gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.pom.asc`
>>>> `gpg --verify apache-mahout-distribution-0.13.0.tar.gz.asc`
>>>>
>>>> I'll vote after running some tests.
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 10:58 PM, Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org 
>>>> <mailto:a...@apache.org>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is the vote for release 0.13.0 of Apache Mahout.
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be going for at least 72 hours and will be closed on
>>>>> Friday,
>>>>> March 3rd, 2017 or once there are at least 3 PMC +1 binding votes
>> (whichever
>>>>> occurs earlier).  Please download, test and vote with
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1, accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache Mahout
>>>>> [ ] +0, I don't care either way,
>>>>> [ ] -1, do not accept RC as the official 0.13.0 release of Apache
>> Mahout
>>>>> ,
>>>>> because...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maven staging repo:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache 
>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache> 
>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache 
>>>>> <https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache>>
>>>>> mahout-1033/org/apache/mahout/apache-mahout-distribution/0.13.0/
>>>>>
>>>>> The git tag to be voted upon is mahout-0.13.0

Reply via email to