I've started an epic at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-2142

Please feel free to comment and add ideas and child stories.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 6:29 PM Manoj Awasthi <awasthi.ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Interesting.
>
> Please keep this group posted so interested people can monitor and join.
> I'll want to contribute if there is any way I can.
>
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 06:27, Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi Amanda, we will be putting an epic up on
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/projects/MAHOUT/issues in the next couple
> > days and posting here for comments and help.
> >
> > In the meantime feel free to go get a copy of the software from
> > https://mahout.apache.org.
> >
> > We have had bug bash and planning meetings at times weekly or monthly;
> may
> > be time to put something back on the calendar..
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 6, 2022 at 2:02 PM Amanda Lunt <amanda.l...@utas.edu.au>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > Where do I find details about this project? General and specific.
> > > I would like to participate, but unsure about getting started :-)
> > >
> > > Amanda
> > >
> > >
> > > On 7/1/22 4:37 am, Andrew Musselman wrote:
> > > Thanks for the input; I'll create an epic this week in jira so we can
> > build
> > > on these ideas.
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 11:30 PM Shaloo Shalini <sh...@hotmail.com
> > ><mailto:
> > > sh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Very interesting!
> > > >
> > > > How about a few more use cases:
> > > >
> > > > (4) Time-series analysis of transactions (overall # per
> > > > week/month/year/customperiod, by user account etc.) for a list of
> > > ledgers.
> > > > (Comparative analysis of usage)
> > > > (5) Max/Min range of transactions for different ledgers
> > > >
> > > > > On 06-Jan-2022, at 6:34 AM, Andrew Musselman <a...@apache.org
> > ><mailto:
> > > a...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > After some chats with Trevor about project direction we wanted to
> > bring
> > > > > some ideas back to the lists.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have professional interest in blockchain tech, including how to
> > query
> > > > > ledgers and submit new entries, how to index the actual blockchain
> > > files
> > > > > for search. Specific interests are in tracking contents of smart
> > > > contracts (
> > > > > https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/smart-contracts/<
> > > https://ethereum.org/en/developers/docs/smart-contracts>) and their
> > > > > execution, doing analytics on public transactions, etc.
> > > > >
> > > > > Proposal is to provide a new data source, namely any number of
> > > > > ethereum-compatible ledgers, and pick a few compelling use cases to
> > > build
> > > > > out this year. Examples could be:
> > > > > (1) Search-indexes of given ledgers
> > > > > (2) Computed similarity to other accounts on the same ledger based
> on
> > > > > activity history
> > > > > (3) Time-series analysis of gas (transaction) fees across multiple
> > > > ledgers
> > > > >
> > > > > If this sounds interesting or if anyone has things to add please
> let
> > me
> > > > > know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Happy New Year!
> > > > >
> > > > > Best
> > > > > Andrew
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Amanda Lunt |  Casual Academic Staff Member | School of Information and
> > > Communication Technology
> > > Syndicate of Schools for Built, Digital and Natural Environments |
> > College
> > > of Sciences and Engineering
> > > University of Tasmania | Locked Bag 1359 | Launceston 7250
> > >
> > > amanda.l...@utas.edu.au<mailto:amanda.l...@utas.edu.au>
> > >
> > > I am currently reading The Chimes by Anna Smaill<
> > > http://www.annasmaill.com/the-chimes.html>
> > >
> > >
> > > This email is confidential, and is for the intended recipient only.
> > > Access, disclosure, copying, distribution, or reliance on any of it by
> > > anyone outside the intended recipient organisation is prohibited and
> may
> > be
> > > a criminal offence. Please delete if obtained in error and email
> > > confirmation to the sender. The views expressed in this email are not
> > > necessarily the views of the University of Tasmania, unless clearly
> > > intended otherwise.
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to