Pretty sure. Screenshot attached.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:42 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: > Are you sure you haven't deleted two of these rows? Because the method > call on the server side is pretty generic: > > SPListItemCollection collListItems = oList.GetItems(listQuery); > > ... where listQuery is this: > > SPQuery listQuery = new SPQuery(); > listQuery.Query = "<OrderBy > Override=\"TRUE\"><FieldRef Name=\"FileRef\" /></OrderBy>"; > listQuery.QueryThrottleMode = > SPQueryThrottleOption.Override; > listQuery.ViewAttributes = "Scope=\"Recursive\""; > listQuery.ViewFields = "<FieldRef Name='FileRef' > />"; > listQuery.RowLimit = 1000; > > It's the same code that is used for all other lists as well, and those do > not suffer any lost rows - I tested that just now against Dmitry's > SharePoint instance. > > Karl > > > > On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Mark Libucha <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Karl, >> >> Thanks for the quick attention. It's better, but not fixed? >> >> I am now getting metadata for the one list row we were choking on before, >> but it doesn't see the other two rows at all. I think the relevant part of >> the log is this: >> >> >> SharePoint: Document identifier is a list: '/DiscussStuff' >> >> SharePoint: getListItems xml response: '<GetListItems xmlns=" >> http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/"><GetListItemsResponse >> xmlns=""><GetListItemsResult >> FileRef="Lists/DiscussStuff/Giants/3_.000"/></GetListItemsResponse></GetListItems>' >> >> There should be a 1_.000 and a 2._000 as well. >> >> Maybe the problem is in the webapp on the SharePoint server? >> >> Thanks again for all the help. >> >> Mark >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Just resolved this ticket, on trunk. >>> >>> Please synch up and try again. >>> >>> Karl >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> CONNECTORS-786. >>>> >>>> I've prioritized this as very high because this is functionality that >>>> used to work but is now broken because I added attachment support. With >>>> luck I will be able to look at it later tonight. >>>> >>>> Karl >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 4:36 PM, Karl Wright <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> This is the problem: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> SharePoint: Can't get version of '/DiscussStuff///Giants/3_. >>>>> 000' because modified date or attachment url not found >>>>> >>>>> It looks like it decided that the list item was in fact an attachment, >>>>> which makes sense because it was a compound list id. >>>>> >>>>> I'll open a ticket for this. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Karl >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Mark Libucha <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 11:50 AM, Karl Wright <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Do you see any of these in the log? >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> There are 3 rows in my discussion group -- two topics, one post in >>>>>> each, one with a reply. In the logs I'm only seeing one of them (the >>>>>> chronologically last to be put into SharePoint). >>>>>> >>>>>> The log looks like this -- maybe that last message means it's choking >>>>>> on this list and giving up on processing it further? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> SharePoint: Document identifier is a list: '/DiscussStuff' >>>>>> >>>>>> SharePoint: getListItems xml response: '<GetListItems xmlns=" >>>>>> http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/"><GetListItemsResponse >>>>>> xmlns=""><GetListItemsResult >>>>>> FileRef="Lists/DiscussStuff/Giants/3_.000"/></GetListItemsResponse></GetListItems>' >>>>>> >>>>>> SharePoint: Checking whether to include list item >>>>>> '/DiscussStuff/Giants/3_.000' >>>>>> >>>>>> SharePoint: Getting version of '/DiscussStuff///Giants/3_.000' >>>>>> >>>>>> SharePoint: Checking whether to include list item attachment >>>>>> '/DiscussStuff/Giants/3_.000' >>>>>> >>>>>> SharePoint: Can't get version of '/DiscussStuff///Giants/3_.000' >>>>>> because modified date or attachment url not found >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
<<attachment: discuss.png>>
