That is interesting. Can you tell us a bit more about your setup? Are any of the masters/slaves being restarted during the run?
@vinodkone On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 7:36 PM, He XianYing <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear, > > I have modified this example a little then run it on a mesos cluster, > this is the output, > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > I0313 09:58:45.253537 30993 long_lived_framework.cpp:90] --The offers's > size is:1 ; 201403121653-2080483520-5050-15252-372 > I0313 09:58:45.253552 30993 long_lived_framework.cpp:107] cpus: 16, mem: > 31058 > I0313 09:58:45.253574 30993 long_lived_framework.cpp:114] Starting task 95 > on ibmc02 > I0313 09:58:45.253641 30993 long_lived_framework.cpp:161] Launched task . > I0313 09:58:45.257099 30997 long_lived_framework.cpp:172] Task: 94 is in > state TASK_LOST > I0313 09:58:45.259341 30996 long_lived_framework.cpp:172] Task: 94 is in > state TASK_RUNNING > I0313 09:58:45.261168 30992 long_lived_framework.cpp:172] Task: 95 is in > state TASK_RUNNING > I0313 09:58:45.262517 30987 long_lived_framework.cpp:172] Task: 95 is in > state TASK_FINISHED > I0313 09:58:45.268265 30984 long_lived_framework.cpp:172] Task: 94 is in > state TASK_FINISHED > I0313 09:58:45.559682 30985 long_lived_framework.cpp:84] ...... > > On above, you will see task 94 status changed > TASK_LOST-->TASK_RUNNING-->TASK_FINISHED. > So I confused why this happend?! > > Best, > Ying. >
