I don't mind helping out shepherding a release through for 0.21.1 though I 
don't have committer rights.


--


Tom Arnfeld

Developer // DueDil

On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Benjamin Mahler
<benjamin.mah...@gmail.com> wrote:

> If anyone is interested in driving a 0.21.1 bug fix release, we could get
> bug fixes out more quickly than waiting for 0.22.0.
> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Tim Chen <t...@mesosphere.io> wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> The patch for MESOS-1925 is already merged into master, so you should be
>> able to just grab master in the mean time.
>>
>> As for 0.22.0 timeline, I don't think we set a timeline yet, usually we
>> call a estimated time to release when we have enough to release a new
>> version.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Scott Rankin <sran...@motus.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   Hi all,
>>>
>>>  We’re very excited here for Mesos and are working on our first
>>> production deployment using Mesos/Marathon/Chronos.  One thing that we need
>>> for production readiness is MESOS-1925.  I see it’s been assigned to 0.22.0
>>> – I was wondering if there was any timeline yet for when that release will
>>> come out.  I can put together our own branch with 0.21.0 + the patch, but
>>> I’d rather wait for the release.
>>>
>>>  Thanks!
>>> Scott
>>>
>>>   This email message contains information that Motus, LLC considers
>>> confidential and/or proprietary, or may later designate as confidential and
>>> proprietary. It is intended only for use of the individual or entity named
>>> above and should not be forwarded to any other persons or entities without
>>> the express consent of Motus, LLC, nor should it be used for any purpose
>>> other than in the course of any potential or actual business relationship
>>> with Motus, LLC. If the reader of this message is not the intended
>>> recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the
>>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
>>> distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If
>>> you have received this communication in error, please notify sender
>>> immediately and destroy the original message.
>>>
>>> Internal Revenue Service regulations require that certain types of
>>> written advice include a disclaimer. To the extent the preceding message
>>> contains advice relating to a Federal tax issue, unless expressly stated
>>> otherwise the advice is not intended or written to be used, and it cannot
>>> be used by the recipient or any other taxpayer, for the purpose of avoiding
>>> Federal tax penalties, and was not written to support the promotion or
>>> marketing of any transaction or matter discussed herein.
>>>
>>
>>

Reply via email to