I believe that DRF is more of a "right of first refusal." Even though marathon's got the higher share, all that means is that chronos will get the offer first; marathon will have to wait until chronos declines it.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 5:33 PM Elizabeth Lingg <elizab...@mesosphere.io> wrote: > Hi, > > This sounds like an issue we encountered, > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MESOS-2546. Are you able to > reproduce this in the latest release? If so, could you add a comment to the > issue? > > Thanks, > Elizabeth > > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:35 AM, <sujz.b...@qq.com> wrote: > >> Suppose I registered two frameworks namely marathon and chronos(both in >> role *) one after another, successfully deployed and run one app app1 by >> marathon, also deployed one cron app app2 by chronos, before app2 due or >> after app2 finished, I can't deploy and launch any new app by marathon >> although there are many resources left, because mesos will send offer to >> chronos all the time as share of chronos is smaller according to DRF, so is >> DRF unreasonable and is there any advice on how to allocate resources in >> this scenario? Any suggestipn will be appreciate. >> Best regards! >> > >
