yep, it fixed in 1.1.0
https://www.mail-archive.com/issues@mesos.apache.org/msg33959.html

On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:51 AM, Joseph Wu <jos...@mesosphere.io> wrote:

> If Apache JIRA were up, I'd point you to a JIRA noting the problem with
> naming docker containers `mesos-*`, as Mesos reserves that prefix (and
> kills everything it considers "unknown").
>
> As a quick workaround, try setting this flag to false:
> https://github.com/apache/mesos/blob/1.1.x/src/slave/flags.cpp#L590-L596
>
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Giulio Eulisse <giulio.euli...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> MMm... it seems to die after a long sequence of forks, and mesos itself
>> seems to be issuing the sigkill. I wonder if it's trying to do some cleanup
>> and it does not realise one of the containers is the agent itself??? Notice
>> I do have `MESOS_DOCKER_MESOS_IMAGE=alisw/mesos-slave:1.0.1` set.
>>
>> On 13 Jan 2017, 01:23 +0100, Giulio Eulisse <giulio.euli...@gmail.com>,
>> wrote:
>>
>> Ciao,
>>
>> the only thing I could find is by running a parallel `docker events`
>>
>> ```
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:20.766593692+01:00 network connect
>> 32441cb5f42b009580e104a8360e544beec7120bb6fff800f16dbee421454267
>> (container=1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71,
>> name=host, type=host)
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:20.846137793+01:00 container start
>> 1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71
>> (build-date=20161214, image=alisw/mesos-slave:1.0.1, license=GPLv2,
>> name=mesos-slave, vendor=CentOS)
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:20.847965921+01:00 container resize
>> 1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71
>> (build-date=20161214, height=16, image=alisw/mesos-slave:1.0.1,
>> license=GPLv2, name=mesos-slave, vendor=CentOS, width=134)
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:21.610141857+01:00 container kill
>> 1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71
>> (build-date=20161214, image=alisw/mesos-slave:1.0.1, license=GPLv2,
>> name=mesos-slave, signal=15, vendor=CentOS)
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:21.610491564+01:00 container kill
>> 1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71
>> (build-date=20161214, image=alisw/mesos-slave:1.0.1, license=GPLv2,
>> name=mesos-slave, signal=9, vendor=CentOS)
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:21.646229213+01:00 container die
>> 1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71
>> (build-date=20161214, exitCode=143, image=alisw/mesos-slave:1.0.1,
>> license=GPLv2, name=mesos-slave, vendor=CentOS)
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:21.652894124+01:00 network disconnect
>> 32441cb5f42b009580e104a8360e544beec7120bb6fff800f16dbee421454267
>> (container=1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71,
>> name=host, type=host)
>> 2017-01-13T01:18:21.705874041+01:00 container stop
>> 1fddd8e8f956f4545c8b36b088eeca74d157eb1923867d28bf2d919d27babb71
>> (build-date=20161214, image=alisw/mesos-slave:1.0.1, license=GPLv2,
>> name=mesos-slave, vendor=CentOS)
>> ```
>>
>> Ciao,
>> Giulio
>>
>> On 13 Jan 2017, 01:06 +0100, haosdent <haosd...@gmail.com>, wrote:
>>
>> Hi, @Giuliio According to your log, it looks normal. Do you have any logs
>> related to "SIGKILL"?
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:00 AM, Giulio Eulisse <giulio.euli...@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I’ve a setup where I run mesos in docker which works perfectly when I
>>> use 0.28.2. I now migrated to 1.0.1 (but it’s the same with 1.1.0 and
>>> 1.0.0) and it seems to receive a sigkill right after saying:
>>>
>>> WARNING: Logging before InitGoogleLogging() is written to STDERR
>>> I0112 23:22:09.889120  4934 main.cpp:243] Build: 2016-08-26 23:06:27 by 
>>> centos
>>> I0112 23:22:09.889181  4934 main.cpp:244] Version: 1.0.1
>>> I0112 23:22:09.889184  4934 main.cpp:247] Git tag: 1.0.1
>>> I0112 23:22:09.889188  4934 main.cpp:251] Git SHA: 
>>> 3611eb0b7eea8d144e9b2e840e0ba16f2f659ee3
>>> W0112 23:22:09.890808  4934 openssl.cpp:398] Failed SSL connections will be 
>>> downgraded to a non-SSL socket
>>> W0112 23:22:09.891237  4934 process.cpp:881] Failed SSL connections will be 
>>> downgraded to a non-SSL socket
>>> E0112 23:22:10.129096  4934 shell.hpp:106] Command 'hadoop version 2>&1' 
>>> failed; this is the output:
>>> sh: hadoop: command not found
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,130:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@726: Client 
>>> environment:zookeeper.version=zookeeper C client 3.4.8
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,130:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@730: Client 
>>> environment:host.name=XXXX.XXX.ch
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,130:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@737: Client 
>>> environment:os.name=Linux
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,130:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@738: Client 
>>> environment:os.arch=3.10.0-229.14.1.el7.x86_64
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,130:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@739: Client 
>>> environment:os.version=#1 SMP Tue Sep 15 15:05:51 UTC 2015
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,131:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@747: Client 
>>> environment:user.name=(null)
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,131:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@755: Client 
>>> environment:user.home=/root
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,131:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@log_env@767: Client 
>>> environment:user.dir=/
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,131:4934(0x7f950503b700):ZOO_INFO@zookeeper_init@800: 
>>> Initiating client connection, 
>>> host=XXX1.YYY.ch:2181,XXX2.YYY.ch:2181,XXX3.YYY.ch:2181 
>>> sessionTimeout=10000 watcher=0x7f950ee20300 sessionId=0 
>>> sessionPasswd=<null> context=0x
>>> 7f94f0000c60 flags=0
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,134:4934(0x7f9501fd7700):ZOO_INFO@check_events@1728: 
>>> initiated connection to server [XX.YY.ZZ.WW:2181]
>>> 2017-01-12 23:22:10,146:4934(0x7f9501fd7700):ZOO_INFO@check_events@1775: 
>>> session establishment complete on server [XX.YY.ZZ.WW:2181
>>> ], sessionId=0x35828ae70fb2065, negotiated timeout=10000
>>>
>>> Any idea of what might be going on? Looks like an OOM, but I do not see
>>> it in /var/log/messages and it also happens with --oom-kill-disable.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ciao,
>>> Giulio
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Haosdent Huang
>>
>>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Haosdent Huang

Reply via email to