Tarjei Huse wrote: > Ok, I just got to understand this correctly. when doing ->update() you only > change the values that you have redefined in an article, right?
Right. > You do not create another article? Nope. > What is the behavior today? I thought the above is the correct way of doing > things ;) According to the manual (the way I read it anyhow) the above code > should change two fields in an article to a new content, IF you got write > rights to that article, that is :) It does. The problem here is (probably) that there's 1.2.5 or 1.4.early-created articles in the database, and those versions did not check for empty or duplicate names. Emile --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
