> > SG0 is something like transparent SG, and trust me > > better leave that SG as it is. > What do you imply by "transparent SG" and "leave it as it is" ?? Do you > mean never use it???
As transparency as glass at window shop. You see a new car but You can not touch it. Well, If you think that storing production site is good idea. Please let me be Your pupil :) > > > You can not manage members and groups within SG0 for example. > I don't get the point: I managed to create several users (at the topmost > level). You mean person? Or member? person -> member -> group > > You may log to Your new SG cause the person You try to log > > was created within that SG. Not in SG0. > > Every person which is in SG0 has almost root privileges. > > They may have root privileges, but I don't understand the fact that I can't > log in SG0 with their username. Is it supposed to be that way? If person from SGx may log to SG0 , then I _really_ start to loose hope for midgard logic.... > OK, we must be careful with users created in SG0, this I can understand > given the fact that they are powerful. But I can't even log as any of them, > that's my point. It's implicit from what I have read up until now that we > can log in SG0 with username created within SG0, no?????? I am not sure I understood You clearly. You want to log as person created in SG0 to SG0? log as user$SG0 > Just to give you the context, I have created users in SGO (around 4 of them) > and a couple of hosts (they are functional and work on internet). Are > saying to me that I should never create anything in SG0?? If You created several hosts for several different persons and uses. Create them as seperate SG. > Also, I don't understand when to use "!", "+", "=", ";", "*". AFAIR Asgard has a bug informing about login possibilities. Piotras --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
