Henri Bergius wrote: >On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 11:25, Alan Knowles wrote: > >>The only concern I have is that the current XML transport layer is not >>as flexible as I would like, -- there are other things I want to do with >>it, my current options are to move towards either XMLRPC or just WDDX, >>both have the downside that an additional module needs to be installed >>on the server. >> > >XML-RPC is also available as a PHP-level library, requiring >no installations. See http://xmlrpc.usefulinc.com/php.html > >The advantage of using XML-RPC would be that it is a relatively >simple protocol, and that libraries are available for most common >programming languages. If we had Midgard API available through >XML-RPC, this would make it easy to write all kinds of client >programs for it. > actually, i just started hacking using serialize = and casting everything to stdClass - although this may be easier and quicker - I think the XML stuff is quite nice, if it could avoid the ]]> cdata issue.
I just had a look at the XMLRPC code, it avoids the repligard ]]> issue by not using CDATA and just doing a htmlspecialchars on the whole lot. - this may be a better answer for the phpmole parser - to go back to using expat as the parser. I was also considering XML-RPC for the apd debugger, I just added socket layer comunication to it, so next step is to add a breakpoint stepping debugger to it. regards alan > >As another matter, I'm sad to admit I still haven't had the >time to install phpmole. The concept is very promising, though. >If only I had more free time, or we had RPMs... > >>alan >> > >/Bergie > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
