Hello all,

Piotras wrote:

Since someone started with the MultiLang I'm
going to continue. There has been a thing
that has really bothered me in the MultiLang -
replication. After the DB conversion it's
virtually impossible to upgrade packages.


What do You mean with "upgrade packages" ?



I mean the conversion from nonML to ML.


We've had some serious performance issues on
one of our servers and have planned on downgrading
back to regular DB format. BTW: Is there any script
available that would do the DB conversion backwards?


Nope. But I was wondering about create something to make
new midgard-data package be usefull for nonML <-> ML.
Whatever it will look like , it will be looong time running.


Alright, we're going to need one for this case. Sooo... I think Rambo will be the man to create somekind of Perl script to sort it out. He's on vacation until 1. July though...

The plan is to run Siege on the site just to
see if the MultiLang is causing any slowness.
Since I believe it will take some time to
get a production server back-ported, I'd be
happy to see any statistics about regular vs.
MultiLang db even before we start the downgrading.


First thing which comes to my mind is "collect" mysql queries
either from mysql log file or midgard log file which may be created
with new apache module, and compare queries' time.
Or maybe something like 'time midgard-pageresolve -options'?

The funny thing is that all individual components work as expected - fast and efficient. But the actual site is pretty darn slow, even with MidCOM cacheing on.

Obviously this is a very large site (over 2000 pages)
and we know that MidCOM generates a performance hit
compared to previous "Simple Dynamic sites". Still
we are dumbfounded by the laaaaag it takes for the
page to display (no, there are not _that_ many images either).

Also, the server we are running this site on
is not very powerful compared to nowadays specs
but it should manage.

BTW , I noticed slow performance with midgard 1.6 but compiled
without Multilang , when one host uses another's one database.
Both hosts are in the same network and use stunnel to secure
connections.

You mean you have DB on separate server?

We've had good results with two server setup.
Although that was mgd-1.5.0 installation...

Piotras


Cheers!

  //Henri

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to