Hi Manos,
I suppose that the best comparison to be made here would be to imagine a "Maven
Java Plugin". We don't have one of course. Instead we have many plugins
available for Java development. I feel that this is what we should be aiming
for other languages also.
As you'd know, there are multiple unit test toolkits, multiple compressors etc.
for JavaScript. I don't think it'd be useful to combine them all into one
plugin. Your thoughts?
Kind regards,
Christopher
On 20/10/2010, at 9:05 PM, Manos Batsis wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 12:37 PM, Christopher Hunt wrote:
>> My approach is to offer plugins
>> focused at one specific area of functionality and then have
>> various archetypes available that pull in plugins for common
>> use-cases.
>
> Not sure I understand the above, wouldn't substituting "plugins" with "plugin
> goals" work for your scenario? If not I'd certainly be interested in it ;-)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
