Parsechecker tool?  Where do I find that?

On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Markus Jelsma <[email protected]>wrote:

>
> > I'm running the latest version of 1.4  We just rebuilt it last week.  Is
> > that patch included?
>
> Yes, so you actually have more than one non-zero length titles coming from
> your parser. Please try the parsechecker tool and confirm, but i'm not
> sure it
> is capable of showing multiple titles.
>
> >
> > And where would it get multiple titles from?
>
> Most likely from PDF or other document types. You can check with a
> stand-alone
> Tika.
>
> > How do I tell what the titles
> > are so I can see if they're valid or not?
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Markus Jelsma
> <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > This should work around the problem in most cases. The parser can
> output
> > > two
> > > titles of which one is actually empty. This patch (in 1.4) skips empty
> > > titles.
> > >
> > > If this doesn't work you really have two _valid_ titles coming from
> your
> > > document.
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/NUTCH-1004
> > >
> > > > It looks like the issue I'm encountering is the same one as here.
> > >
> > >
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/multiple-values-encountered-for-non-mu
> > > lt
> > >
> > > > iValued-field-title-td1446817.html
> > > >
> > > > I'm not really sure what the linked bug is since that involves the
> HTML
> > > > parser and I'm seeing this problem with a PDF file.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Bai Shen <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > > > I'm getting an exception when I try to commit to Solr.  Looking at
> > > > > the Solr log, it's showing that title is getting multiple values
> > > > > when it's not a multivalue field.  None of my code does anything
> > > > > with the title, so I'm not sure why this is happening.
> > > > >
> > > > > How can I look at the pending commit and determine why and/or
> delete
> > >
> > > the
> > >
> > > > > extraneous values?  The document in question is a pdf if that
> makes a
> > > > > difference.
>

Reply via email to