That was likely an old schema. In trunk (or was it already in1.4) it is of type date. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/nutch/trunk/conf/schema.xml?view=markup
> Remi, I had a similar problem but for a custom field that I was trying to > post to Solr (via solrindex) as a type="date" in the schema.xml. Turns out > my date string was formatted incorrectly (it was missing the trailing Z). > From the error message it appears that perhaps the field into which this > field is going in is set as long or int. If you set it to type="date" it > should take it (and you can do Solr's date arithmetic on it. > > On Feb 15, 2012, at 11:01 AM, remi tassing wrote: > > Awesome! > > > > Pushing this to Solr gives me an error (solrindex): > > SEVERE: java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input string: > > "2012-02-08T14:40:09.416Z" > > > > at java.lang.NumberFormatException.forInputString(Unknown Source) > > > > But I'll try to figure this out on my own > > > > I really appreciate your help! > > > > Remi > > > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Markus Jelsma > > > > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> sure, use the indexchecker tool. > >> > >>> Is it any quick way to see the impact of index-more? I deleted the > >>> parse related folders in the segment and re-parsed it but when I > >>> readseg there > >> > >> is > >> > >>> no.difference.... > >>> > >>> On Wednesday, February 15, 2012, Lewis John Mcgibbney < > >>> > >>> [email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, remi tassing <[email protected]> > >>> > >>> wrote: > >>>>> tstamp shows a string of digits like 20020123123212 > >>>> > >>>> This is OK. yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm-ssZ It is however hellishly old ! > >>>> > >>>>> Never heard of the plugin "index-more" and it's poorly documented. > >>>> > >>>> Well it's been included in 1.2 onwards so I'm very surprised @ that. > >>>> If > >>> > >>> you > >>> > >>>> feel like it then please feel free to add documentation, this is > >>>> always something we are after and would be a great help to the > >>>> community. > >>>> > >>>> After > >>>> > >>>>> adding this to plugins.include, I'll need to run solrindex or is it > >>>>> necessary to re-parse or recrawl (I think this less likely IMO)? > >>>> > >>>> If you wish to have the fields we are able to extract with index-more > >>>> e.g. > >>>> > >>>> <!-- fields for index-more plugin --> 81 <field name="type" > >>>> type="string" stored="true" indexed="true" 82 multiValued="true"/> > >>>> 83 <field name="contentLength" type="long" stored="true" 84 > >>>> indexed="false"/> 85 > >>> > >>> <field > >>> > >>>> name="lastModified" type="long" stored="true" 86 indexed="true"/> 87 > >>> > >>> <field > >>> > >>>> name="date" type="string" stored="true" indexed="true"/> > >>>> then you'll need to add the plugin, I would rebuild the project if it > >> > >> is > >> > >>>> possible but this is not essential, then index your content. And yes I > >>>> would expect the parsers need to be re-run to extract the lastModified > >>>> value from pages.
