Julien, could you please elaborate a bit about your comment about speed depending on the backend used?
Yes, you were the person I was referring to :) Oh, and *believe* you said it was the fetching speed that was different between 1.x and 2.x. Is that right? Or is some other phase slower in 2.x? Thanks, Otis ---- Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / Hadoop / HBase - http://sematext.com/spm >________________________________ > From: Julien Nioche <[email protected]> >To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 10:54 AM >Subject: Re: 2.x vs. 1.x speed > > >Hi Otis, > >That certainly depends on the backend used but on the whole it wouldn't be >surprising. Would be good to have some data to substantiate it. I am >planning to put my intern on the case and have some basic comparison as >soon as she gets a good grip of Hadoop / Nutch etc... but if someone else >wants to do it please go ahead. > >In case I happen to be the person who told you that Otis, well at least I >am consistent ;-) > >Julien > > > > > > > > > > >On 6 August 2013 09:08, Otis Gospodnetic <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> At some point earlier this year I spoke to a person who told me 2.x is >> (a little?) slower than 1.x. Is that still the case? >> >> Thanks, >> Otis >> -- >> Solr & ElasticSearch Support -- http://sematext.com/ >> Performance Monitoring -- http://sematext.com/spm >> > > > >-- >* >*Open Source Solutions for Text Engineering > >http://digitalpebble.blogspot.com/ >http://www.digitalpebble.com >http://twitter.com/digitalpebble > > >
