Hi Simon,
It looks like your partnerLinkType names don't match. You cut&pasted this
name "replyCCHeckPartnerLinkType" while the error shows, "{
http://ode/bpel/bank.wsdl}replyCCheckPartnerLinkType";. The names are
case-sensitive.
alex
On 2/2/08, Simone Maletta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> yes I read your mail and I make a mistake publisching a wrong WSDL.
> This the last I wrote following your suggest:
>
> <plnk:partnerLinkType name="replyCCHeckPartnerLinkType">
>
> <plnk:role name="send" portType="tns:replyCCHeckPortType"/>
>
> </plnk:partnerLinkType>
>
>
>
> <plnk:partnerLinkType name="InvokeCCCheckPartnerLinkType">
>
> <plnk:role name="invoke" portType="CCCheckNS:CCCheckPortType"/>
>
> <plnk:role name="response" portType="CCCheckNS:CCCheckPortType"/>
>
> </plnk:partnerLinkType>
>
>
>
>
> <plnk:partnerLinkType name="requestCCheckPartnerLinkType">
>
> <plnk:role name="you" portType="tns:requestCCheckMessagePortType"/>
>
> </plnk:partnerLinkType>
>
>
>
> To better understand what I'm trying to do I want to explain to you better
> my underground.
> I've got three processes: an Invoker, a process realized with the BPEL
> that
> we will call bank and another one realized as an EJB, CCheck. I'm trying
> to
> develope bank process.
> My process needs to communicate asynchronously with the Invoker, this is
> the
> fact I wrote two one way partner link type, while it has to communicate
> with
> CCheck synchronously, in fact it's only scope is to access to a db, and I
> designed a two way partner link. In the asynchronously protocol is not
> allowed a callback.
> Tha fact is: I don't understand why writing the code as the one in ODE
> examples or using the syntax in the book I used or the following your
> suggestes I'm at the same point:
>
> file:/home/jars/Tesi/ode/WEB-INF/processes/bank/bankBPEL.bpel:35: error:
> [UndeclaredPartnerLinkType] Attempt to reference undeclared partner link
> type "{http://ode/bpel/bank.wsdl}replyCCheckPartnerLinkType";.
>
> I've got no idea where the error is or what I've to do.
> Thank you for any suggest,
> Simone
>
