Interesting, thanks Scott !

Jacques

De : "Scott Gray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> It looks like they've fixed it in Java 6, it appears to be a popular
issue:
> http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4212439
>
> On 12/04/07, Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > My answer was from experience ;o)
> >
> > Is there a Jira issue for that, should we create one ?
> >
> > Jacques
> >
> > >
> > > This would be true except that we use the ResourceBundle class of
the
> > > Java API, and that class keeps its own cache that prevents
reloading.
> > >
> > > So for now we are stuck with a restart to reload on properties
files.
> > > We've been talking about rewriting the UtilProperties stuff to not
> > > use ResourceBundle (there are various notes in the java file on
it),
> > > but that hasn't been done yet.
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 12, 2007, at 2:49 AM, Scott Gray wrote:
> > >
> > > > I was under the impression the properties are loaded and cached
the
> > > > first
> > > > time the file is used and can be cleared via webtools
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > > > On 12/04/07, Jacques Le Roux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Deploying a classpath resource is similar to deploying a
compiled
> > > >> Java
> > > >> class :  you have to reload.
> > > >>
> > > >> This article may be of interest in this field :
> > > >> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/javatips/jw-javatip125.html
> > > >>
> > > >> Jacques
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi,
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > When you are working with files that are not using entity
tags
> > > >> > ("<entity-engine-xml>"), such as 'arithmetic.properties' is
there
> > a
> > > >> method
> > > >> > to load the data, or is the file called each time it is used.
(I
> > > >> did
> > > >> clear
> > > >> > the cache).
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I would like to understand this better, any guidance would be
> > > >> appreciated.
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thanks & Regards,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Peter
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to