De : "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > --On Thursday, November 08, 2007 7:30 PM +0100 Jacopo Cappellato > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I apologize but I was not very clear. I do really think that the metadata > > (data model) information is a *valuable* source of information and should > > really stay in the trunk, your work will be of great help. > > On the other hand, the wiki style documentation could be useful for > > screen level online help, even if the pulling the metadata information > > would be helpful too (e.g. the screen widget could automatically pull > > information from field's metadata). > > My concern was the contribution agreement to commit, and the ease with > which someone without an agreement can add to the wiki. > > The wiki can also act as a "staging area" for information headed for > committing, but a similar issue arises, unless contributions to the wiki > are automatically considered to be under community license compatible with > a commit.
You mean documentation ? Jacques
