BTW did a search of the trunk, lots of minilanq and java code using it.

BJ Freeman sent the following on 4/7/2008 11:22 AM:
> I am deducing from the same link I sent you it has to do with history
> like dates that this inventory Item has certian levels of on hand.
> walking down the sequence ID a routine would find an inventory diff.
> it might be used for taking inventory and matching it against physical
> inventory and noting the differences.
> it would also be used in receiving to note the differences between an
> invoice and actual received.
> 
> the only import I can see would be after an physical inventory count and
> the xls sheets would update.
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 4/7/2008 10:45 AM:
>> Thanks BJ.
>>
>> I already saw all this.  I just can't see where and what for the entity is
>> used for.
>>
>> Skip
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: BJ Freeman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:58 AM
>> To: user@ofbiz.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: "InventoryItemDetail"
>>
>>
>> https://demo.hotwaxmedia.com/webtools/control/ViewRelations?entityName=Inven
>> toryItemDetail
>>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent the following on 4/7/2008 8:33 AM:
>>> Now that the weekend is over, I am re-submitting this question hoping that
>>> one of the big guns is listening.
>>>
>>>
>>> Can someone explain the importance and use of this "InventoryItemDetail"
>>> entity?
>>>
>>> I am debating whether or not to add code to my import routines to support
>>> it, but don't see much use, at least in the java code or simple method xml
>>> files.
>>>
>>> Skip
>>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>>> Checked by AVG.
>>> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.5/1359 - Release Date: 4/4/2008
>>> 8:23 AM
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.5/1359 - Release Date: 4/4/2008
>> 8:23 AM
>>
>> No virus found in this outgoing message.
>> Checked by AVG.
>> Version: 7.5.519 / Virus Database: 269.22.5/1359 - Release Date: 4/4/2008
>> 8:23 AM
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to