Thank you very much for your kindly reply. Your reply make my brain get fresh (but still dumb)
Thank you again Tanakorn Numrubporn Rishi Solanki wrote: > > The relation-type = nofk is used when we need a relation but don't want to > apply foreign key constraints on it. > This relation comes in existance only when we need to use the attribute of > a > entity into another entity. And we needed > that when we delete/expire a record from entity say > "PaymentBudgetAllocation" then their is no need to delete the record > from "BudgetItem". In such case we specify relation-type = nofk. > > Thanks and Regards > [Rishi Solnaki] > > > > On Tue, Jun 24, 2008 at 5:41 PM, him_aeng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> I see you intent to make two of compound key (budgetId and >> budgetItemSeqId) >> of PaymentBudgetAllocation entity have relation-type = nofk that not >> similar >> to "The Data Model Resource Book Vol.1" in Figure 8.10. I think you have >> to >> has a good reason for implementation >> >> /applications/accounting/entitydef/entitymodel.xml >> >> <entity entity-name="PaymentBudgetAllocation" >> package-name="org.ofbiz.accounting.payment" >> title="Payment Budget Allocation Entity"> >> <field name="budgetId" type="id-ne"></field> >> <field name="budgetItemSeqId" type="id-ne"></field> >> <field name="paymentId" type="id-ne"></field> >> <field name="amount" type="currency-amount"></field> >> <prim-key field="budgetId"/> >> <prim-key field="budgetItemSeqId"/> >> <prim-key field="paymentId"/> >> <relation type="one" fk-name="PAYMENT_BA_BDGT" >> rel-entity-name="Budget"> >> <key-map field-name="budgetId"/> >> </relation> >> - <relation type="one-nofk" rel-entity-name="BudgetItem"> >> + <relation type="one" fk-name="PAYMENT_BUDGIT" >> rel-entity-name="BudgetItem"> >> <key-map field-name="budgetId"/> >> <key-map field-name="budgetItemSeqId"/> >> </relation> >> <relation type="one" fk-name="PAYMENT_BA_PMT" >> rel-entity-name="Payment"> >> <key-map field-name="paymentId"/> >> </relation> >> </entity> >> >> and another question in the same figure in the book (Figure 8.10). In >> order_item entity has two attribute that is budgetId and budgetItemSeqId >> but >> you don't use it to link to budget_item entity, and I don't know why? >> >> /applications/order/entitydef/entitymodel.xml >> >> <entity entity-name="OrderItem" >> package-name="org.ofbiz.order.order" >> never-cache="true" >> title="Order Item Entity"> >> <field name="orderId" type="id-ne"></field> >> <field name="orderItemSeqId" type="id-ne"></field> >> <field name="externalId" type="id"></field> >> <field name="orderItemTypeId" type="id-ne"></field> >> <field name="orderItemGroupSeqId" type="id-ne"></field> >> <field name="isItemGroupPrimary" type="indicator"></field> >> <field name="fromInventoryItemId" type="id"></field> >> <field name="budgetId" type="id"></field> >> <field name="budgetItemSeqId" type="id"></field> >> ... >> + <relation type="one" fk-name="ORDER_ITEM_BUDGET_ITEM" >> rel-entity-name="BudgetItem"> >> + <key-map field-name="budgetId"/> >> + <key-map field-name="budgetItemSeqId"/> >> + </relation> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Many-entities-that-should-has-foreign-key-but-it-not%2C-why--tp18089666p18089666.html >> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Many-entities-that-should-has-foreign-key-but-it-not%2C-why--tp18089666p18112059.html Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.