Hopefully the people that have done the refactoring will respond. I have never run across the requirement myself. even in SQL.
ian tabangay sent the following on 11/20/2008 7:23 PM: > oh ok. thank you for all who responded. > BJ, would you happen to know why this wasnt implemented? > im pretty sure this is not the first time this scenario had been > encountered. > > > On Fri, Nov 21, 2008 at 3:26 AM, BJ Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> your other options is to go to the dev mailing list and propose a change >> that you are willing to do, that would allow this function. >> Not saying you will get a positive response, but it is worth a shot. >> if you get a positive response they will tell you the next step. >> >
