BJ: have you by any chance looked at any of the other service definitions and compared them to the webtools service reference (which I assume you're talking about here, you didn't say)?
-David On Dec 31, 2009, at 2:29 AM, BJ Freeman wrote: > the in parameters for getRelatedParties.userlogin(rev 9.04) is shown as > optional and provided internally. should this be changed. > > David E Jones sent the following on 12/30/2009 11:00 PM: >> Requiring a permission (authorization) is different from requiring >> authentication. >> >> -David >> >> >> On Dec 31, 2009, at 12:57 AM, zhiyongcui wrote: >> >>> But there isn't any permission check in the service definition. >>> >>> David E Jones-4 wrote: >>>> >>>> You need to pass the userLogin or security credentials from the calling >>>> service to the service it is calling. >>>> >>>> -David >>>> >>>> >>>> On Dec 30, 2009, at 11:21 PM, zhiyongcui wrote: >>>> >>>>> When I access a service called getRelatedParties from another service >>>>> definition , I got a message as below: >>>>> ServiceDispatcher.java:532:ERROR] Error in Service [getRelatedParties]: >>>>> You >>>>> must be logged in to complete the [Get Parties Related to a Party] >>>>> process. >>>>> But I can't see any permission check in the getRelatedParties definition. >>>>> Anybody could help me? >>>>> -- >>>>> View this message in context: >>>>> http://n4.nabble.com/Access-service-error-tp991277p991277.html >>>>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> View this message in context: >>> http://n4.nabble.com/Access-service-error-tp991277p991298.html >>> Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >
