It could be related somehow to the single digit month which seems to have shown up in the calendar since the start of this month (well that's when I noticed it).
Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 20/01/2010, at 10:30 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > Chris, > > To be clear I did not say it will fix it. I simply asked you to try. > Because I had to revert r900950 since it introduced a bad side effect for > lookups by name (ordinary lookups seemed not to be > affected) and maybe this is also related. I'm still investigating the why, > and also I can't easily test the AM-PM stuff since I'm on > a "French" machine (ok I could but I have enough things to do already ;o) > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=900950&view=rev > > Please report in any cases. For the demo server we have to wait a day now... > > Thanks for your help > > Jacques > > From: "Chris Snow" <sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk> >> ah, that's at: 901102 >> >> Chris Snow wrote: >>> this was on demo.ofbiz.org >>> >>> Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>> Try to update to at least r901197 >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> From: "Chris Snow" <sno...@snowconsulting.co.uk> >>>>> I have just created a work effort on demo.ofbiz.org with an estimated >>>>> start date. >>>>> >>>>> If I later go back into the work effort, and click the calendar popup for >>>>> the estimated start date, 3am and 3pm are both >>>>> represented as yyyy-m-dd 3:MM:ss >>>>> >>>>> Is this a bug? >>>>> >>>>> Many thanks, >>>>> >>>>> Chris >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
