Hi Hans, Is there any reason that you know of for us to retain the XML interface at all? If the "API" is better then shouldn't we just use it alone?
If we end up keeping both we might need better names, XML vs. API doesn't mean much (I mean the XML interface is also an API) or is this how eBay describes them? Regards Scott HotWax Media http://www.hotwaxmedia.com On 28/01/2010, at 9:32 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > Hi follow OFBiz users. > > as you have seen at the latest commits we have extended the ebay > component by using the Ebay API which allows an ofbiz user to (almost) > maintain all Ebay functions within OFBiz. > > Up to now there was no overlap between the existing XML functions and > the new API functions, however there now will be..... > > Uploading products in the existing ebay function does not allow > maintaining inventory within in Ebay, but the new upload function does > or does not allow it set by a flag, so there is overlap. > > We plan further to duplicate all XML functions using the API interface. > > So hereby we propose to rename the existing Ebay component to "EbayXml" > and create a new Ebay component called "EbayAPI" both in the specialized > directory. > > comments or suggestions? > > -- > Antwebsystems.com: Quality OFBiz services for competitive rates >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
