>At the moment the tree is sorted by seqnum and categoryId, >we will change it to segnum, categoryName.
I think the above seems correct. From what understand regarding your recent code modification, you were trying to optimize large categories, probably by caching the entire category listing in one shot. Is this correct? What is puzzling is why the Demo Google is affected (a separate catalog), unless the caching is taking place at the browse root level (one gigantic cache), and not at the individual catalog level (multiple catalog cache entries). On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 4:10 PM, Hans Bakker <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com>wrote: > can you explain what you think is the correct sort order? > > 'reversed' is a bit difficult to understand for us. > > > Regards, > Hans > > On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 12:58 -0700, Mike wrote: > > I checked, and it's running post r1086436 code, and the Google Demo > category > > sort still appears reversed. > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > r1086436 | hansbak | 2011-03-28 15:59:50 -0700 (Mon, 28 Mar 2011) | 1 > line > > Changed paths: > > M > > > /ofbiz/trunk/applications/product/src/org/ofbiz/product/category/CategoryServices.java > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 6:57 AM, Jacques Le Roux < > > jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote: > > > > > Actually in this case it was ok (I checked yesterday). You can check > the > > > rel-rev # in the footer... > > > > > > Jacques > > > > > > From: "Hans Bakker" <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> > > > > > > Hi Mike, > > >> > > >> 1. it can take up to 24hrs until the revision shows up in the trunk > > >> 2. is the sorting now acceptable or not and how you would like to have > > >> the sorting? > > >> > > >> regards, > > >> Hans > > >> > > >> On Tue, 2011-03-29 at 01:03 -0700, Mike wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hey Hans. I tested this and it doesn't seem to work. Trunk-demo > shows > > >>> the > > >>> same. > > >>> > > >>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Hans Bakker > > >>> <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com>wrote: > > >>> > > >>> > Committed revision 1086436: "catalog category tree now ordered by > > >>> seqnum > > >>> > and category name > > >>> > > > >>> > Regards, > > >>> > Hans > > >>> > > > >>> > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 08:47 -0700, Mike wrote: > > >>> > > Something has changed with the sorting of the category listing. > I > > >>> > noticed > > >>> > > this about 1-2 weeks ago: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > If you go to demo: > > >>> > > > > >>> > > http://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/control/main > > >>> > > > > >>> > > <http://demo-trunk.ofbiz.apache.org/ecommerce/control/main > >Select > > >>> the > > >>> > > "Google Catalog", and you'll see that the category list is now > > >>> reversed > > >>> > > (Animals were always on top before). I also noticed the same on > my > > >>> own > > >>> > > category listing. > > >>> > > > > >>> > > Any idea? > > >>> > > > >>> > -- > > >>> > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > >>> > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > >>> > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > > >> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > > >> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- > Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >
