Mike,
Thanks to vbhansaly, I got this information: it's now an hot-depoy component
in Opentaps, see
http://www.opentaps.org/forum/opentaps-general-discussions/general-discussions-english/funambol-admin-otfmadminguidedoc-corr
The good news is I saw it seems there are now support for smartphones (see
funambol\_config\com\funambol\server\engine\pipeline).
The bad news I'm afraid, this is not only not directly compatible with OFBiz
but even with the previous Opentaps version I adapted
to OFBiz. The joys of forking...
Jacques
From: "Jacques Le Roux" <jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com>
Hi Mike, Adrian,
From the start in Opentaps it's only intended to work with Funambol Outlook
Plugin. But I think you can extend from there, need
more
work...
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-4247
I have still to attach the certificate I specially created (I don't remember
where I put it ;o). For the Opentaps part even after
clean+export+zip it's still 100MB+. So I can't attach it to Jira (max 10MB).
I'm uploading it to my own server and will put a link
from Jira
I hope I did not forget anything, anyway easy to add later...
Jacques
From: "Mike" <mz4whee...@gmail.com>
Hey Jacques. What is the extent of the Funambol integration? What
OfBiz features can a smartphone get from it? Thanks.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:48 PM, Jacques Le Roux
<jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com> wrote:
Ho, it should run on trunk, I used r1055454. I will try to see the status
tomorrow morning... The Jira was almost done but I got very busy since
then...
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
Nothing is impossible.
I would be interested in taking a look at it - even if it doesn't run on
the current trunk.
-Adrian
On 4/6/2011 9:37 AM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
Hé wait Adrian, during fall I have already re-written their Funambol
module, with doc ready and all. It's just that I have not
enough time to publish it on Jira (was done for previous client in a
custom app). I just need to test it again in OFBiz OOTB...
If you are interested there is only one point I could not handle (and I
think it's impossible)
https://core.forge.funambol.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=405&dsMessageId=139101
Jacques
From: "Adrian Crum" <adrian.c...@sandglass-software.com>
Opentaps going with Hibernate (and Spring) was a useless effort, in my
opinion.
Coincidentally, I'm currently working on rewriting their Funambol module
so it will run on plain OFBiz, and I can assure you,
adding those technologies does nothing more than make a simple task
unnecessarily complicated.
OFBiz has the ability to generate UI artifacts from the database.
-Adrian
On 4/5/2011 5:57 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
Adrian,
Evalutating other technologies and how I can utilize them and combine
them with ofbiz database is not a waste of time, like you claim.
There are technologies available that allow us to generate data model,
and services from the database, and leave us with only UI to create.
Some frameworks
like isis may even create the UI using naked objects, from the
database.
I wanted to see how far I can go, generating JPA entities using ofbiz
database.
That's why I wanted to name an id "id", and make it an integer.
This is not useless effort. Opentaps, have gone with hibernate already
!
I trully value your advice about how to use my time productively.
On Tue Apr 05,2011 09:24 pm, Adrian Crum wrote:
Huh? What does Isis have to do with OFBiz?
-Adrian
On 4/5/2011 5:19 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
http://incubator.apache.org/isis/
On Tue Apr 05,2011 08:18 pm, Adrian Crum wrote:
Why would you want to do that? It would result in rewriting the
entire
project to change the field names.
It seems to me you will be wasting a lot of time trying to make
OFBiz
code look the way you want it to look - without adding anything new
or
fixing anything. Instead, why not use the project in the way it was
intended, and spend your time getting something useful accomplished?
-Adrian
On 4/5/2011 4:13 PM, Mansour Al Akeel wrote:
Thank you all. I understand now the reasons behind using VARCHAR.
I found my way around this. I can just change the data type in the
fieldtypepostnew.xml. This way I can declare all the ids as
integers,
and indicators as boolean instead of CHAR(1).
However still wondering if there is a way to change the name of the
ids
to only id without having to go through each foriegn key.
On Mon Apr 04,2011 05:08 am, David E Jones wrote:
As for naming all "id" fields just plain "id", it makes it far
more difficult to keep track of foreign keys. The nice thing
about giving even sequenced ID fields a somewhat unique name is
that you can use that same name on other entities/tables and
have them match up automatically.
The Entity Engine does a lot with field name mapping for
relationships between entities, and there are thousands of these in
the OFBiz data model, so the few extra characters goes a long way
toward making things easier to understand and maintain.
-David
On Apr 4, 2011, at 12:19 AM, Erwan de FERRIERES wrote:
Le 03/04/2011 06:15, Mansour Al Akeel a ?crit :
Hello all,
I am wondering about the reasons behind using VARCHAR for
entities Id,
instead of a numeric value with autoincrement. Another thing is
the
naming of the primary key. For example, accommodation_class has
it's
primary key as "accommodation_class_id". Wouldn't it be easier
just to
name it "id"?
Hi Mansour,
just go to this page :
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Why-primary-keys-are-VAR-CHAR-type-in-OFBiz-td146555.html#a146562
Cheers,
--
Erwan de FERRIERES
www.nereide.biz
