Just to put out an opposing point of view, I recommend using the latest stable 
release and not the trunk.  The trunk is susceptible to new bugs whereas 10.04 
is not and in fact has seen nothing but bug fixes for the past 15 months.  So 
imagine taking the trunk and spending 15 months only fixing bugs, that is what 
10.04 is.  Does the trunk have more features? Yes, but in my opinion you're 
unlikely to need any of them and if you do you can always consider back porting 
the relevant code that you need.

Using the trunk is simply more convenient for committers because they can 
commit their changes instead of maintaining patches like everyone else.  Most 
users don't have that power and if they do submit a patch it is pretty unlikely 
it will get committed very quickly.

Regards
Scott

On 24/07/2011, at 4:45 PM, Hans Bakker wrote:

> Hi Tim,
> 
> i just tested with the trunk version and followed the following blog:
> http://www.antwebsystems.com/control/ViewBlogArticle?contentId=16907
> 
> There it is working well.
> 
> I advice you to use the latest trunk version and not 10.04. Here in
> Antwebsystems we always use the latest version from svn which in my
> opinion has the least problems and the most features.
> If there would be a blocking problem in the latest version, we normally
> fix that within a couple of hours after reporting.
> 
> Further, Postgresql is preferred above Mysql seeing the recent takeover
> by Oracle and the following article:
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Why_PostgreSQL_Instead_of_MySQL:_Comparing_Reliability_and_Speed_in_2007
> 
> Regards,
> Hans
> 
> 
> On Fri, 2011-06-03 at 12:59 -0700, Tim Stoel wrote:
>> I have OfBiz 10.04 installed on a local server with MySQL as the database
>> engine, we¹ve been working with this for about six months now. We are
>> intending to use OfBiz for eCommerce, as well as sales order processing for
>> eBay orders and have made a lot of progress in adapting it to our business.
>> When we installed OfBiz, there is a lot of demo data in the database.  I
>> wondered what the best way is to deal with this data.  When I setup OfBiz
>> with only seed data, it seemed a lot of things were not configured that were
>> useful, which is why I went back to using all of the demo data.  Should it
>> be deleted one record at a time manually using another database tool?  What
>> is the best path to get from an install of OfBiz to using it without the
>> excess demo entries?  Is there any documentation on this?
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Tim
> 
> -- 
> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz
> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak
> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates.
> 

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to