Sorry Jacopo. I misread your posted stats. The numbers actually look pretty good.
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 10:20 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > Sorry, I don't understand > > Jacopo > > On Apr 2, 2012, at 7:14 PM, Mike wrote: > > > Hey Jacopo. It looks as though the improvement in performance is due > > mainly to a logging parameter change. However, the original post > indicated > > a 4x performance deficit, which isn't really reflected in the below > > statistics. > > > > It's faster, but nowhere near 4x. Is it possible to downgrade freemarker > > to gain back performance? > > > > On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:16 AM, Jacopo Cappellato < > > jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com> wrote: > > > >> Thank you Hans, > >> > >> I had to actually spend a lot of time to fix it. > >> But at the end it was not an issue in Freemarker but instead the problem > >> was that we were not disabling debug messages in freemarker classes. > >> I have fixed this by adding proper Log4J configuration and then I have > >> upgraded to the latest stable release of freemarker (2.3.19). > >> The performance looks good; I have executed (using JMeter) the main > >> ecommerce screen with 50 threads hitting the page 100 times each: > >> > >> with 2.3.10 > >> > >> Generate Summary Results = 5000 in 195.2s = 25.6/s Avg: 1925 Min: > >> 74 Max: 9307 Err: 0 (0.00%) > >> > >> with 2.3.19 > >> > >> Generate Summary Results = 5000 in 187.6s = 26.6/s Avg: 1842 Min: > >> 88 Max: 8483 Err: 0 (0.00%) > >> > >> The new version is slightly faster now. > >> > >> Hans, could you now please revert the changes you did when you switched > >> back to 2.3.10? I am especially interested in having back the catalog > >> Directive (instead of the Transform) because in future versions of > >> Freemarker Transforms will not be supported and we will have to start > the > >> migration to directives: having one in place will definitely help. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> Jacopo > >> > >> > >> On Apr 2, 2012, at 9:49 AM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >> > >>> Very impressive Jacopo: good Job. > >>> > >>> see what the developers of freemarker say..... > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Hans > >>> > >>> On 04/02/2012 02:43 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote: > >>>> An update on this: I have found and resolved the issue that Hans > >> reported on Freemarker bug tracker: > >>>> > >>>> > >> > https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=3046069&group_id=794&atid=100794 > >>>> > >>>> Now I am working with them to see if my change can be made official > and > >> released. > >>>> > >>>> Jacopo > >>>> > >>>> On Aug 22, 2010, at 2:52 PM, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> We are sill working on this to optimize the cache so the newest > >>>>> freemarker will work again. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> Hans > >>>>> > >>>>> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 02:38 -0700, Mike Z wrote: > >>>>>> Any update on this? Thanks. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Hans Bakker > >>>>>> <mailingl...@antwebsystems.com> wrote: > >>>>>>> We tried the newer version but is also slow. > >>>>>>> we are are now looking into moving back to the 2.3.10 version. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>> Hans > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 09:22 +0200, Jacques Le Roux wrote: > >>>>>>>> I found only that > >> http://freemarker.sourceforge.net/docs/app_faq.html#faq_question_25 So > >> nothing special. > >>>>>>>> We could try to upgrade to newer versions but 2.3.16 does not seem > >> to bring much and 2.4 is not ready yet. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Jacques > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>>>>>>> this problem about the speed is caused in rev: 731487: > >>>>>>>>> Upgrade Freemarker jar from 2.3.10 to 2.3.15 > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>> Hans > >>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>> On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 08:45 +0700, Hans Bakker wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> currently we are helping a customer to upgrade their ofbiz > >> version. > >>>>>>>>>> We are using "Apache bench" to test the ecommerce frontend. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> We now found that the current trunk is dramatically slower than > >> rev > >>>>>>>>>> 728596 from about 1.5 years ago. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> the test results: > >>>>>>>>>> rev 728596: > >>>>>>>>>> total time : 34.667 seconds > >>>>>>>>>> Requests per second: 14.42 [#/sec] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> trunk rev 959845 > >>>>>>>>>> total time : 152.698 seconds > >>>>>>>>>> Requests per second: 3.27 [#/sec] > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> below the complete test results. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Help appreciated. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Regards, > >>>>>>>>>> Hans. > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Test results, local compute ubuntu 10.04 java memory allocation > >> max > >>>>>>>>>> 2048Mb > >>>>>>>>>> running in background, cache enabled. (cache.properties) > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> command line: > >>>>>>>>>> ab -n 500 -c 50 http://localhost:8080/ecommerce/control/main > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> rev 728596 > >>>>>>>>>> ----------- > >>>>>>>>>> Server Software: Apache-Coyote/1.1 > >>>>>>>>>> Server Hostname: localhost > >>>>>>>>>> Server Port: 8080 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Document Path: /ecommerce/control/main > >>>>>>>>>> Document Length: 60531 bytes > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Concurrency Level: 50 > >>>>>>>>>> Time taken for tests: 34.667 seconds > >>>>>>>>>> Complete requests: 500 > >>>>>>>>>> Failed requests: 496 > >>>>>>>>>> (Connect: 0, Receive: 0, Length: 496, Exceptions: 0) > >>>>>>>>>> Write errors: 0 > >>>>>>>>>> Total transferred: 30412908 bytes > >>>>>>>>>> HTML transferred: 30262908 bytes > >>>>>>>>>> Requests per second: 14.42 [#/sec] (mean) > >>>>>>>>>> Time per request: 3466.737 [ms] (mean) > >>>>>>>>>> Time per request: 69.335 [ms] (mean, across all concurrent > >>>>>>>>>> requests) > >>>>>>>>>> Transfer rate: 856.72 [Kbytes/sec] received > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Connection Times (ms) > >>>>>>>>>> min mean[+/-sd] median max > >>>>>>>>>> Connect: 0 198 745.6 0 3000 > >>>>>>>>>> Processing: 1173 3239 778.2 3228 6287 > >>>>>>>>>> Waiting: 40 433 318.7 357 1879 > >>>>>>>>>> Total: 1173 3437 1287.7 3228 9287 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> rev 959845 > >>>>>>>>>> =========== > >>>>>>>>>> Server Software: Apache-Coyote/1.1 > >>>>>>>>>> Server Hostname: localhost > >>>>>>>>>> Server Port: 8080 > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Document Path: /ecommerce/control/main > >>>>>>>>>> Document Length: 65788 bytes > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Concurrency Level: 50 > >>>>>>>>>> Time taken for tests: 152.698 seconds > >>>>>>>>>> Complete requests: 500 > >>>>>>>>>> Failed requests: 499 > >>>>>>>>>> (Connect: 0, Receive: 0, Length: 499, Exceptions: 0) > >>>>>>>>>> Write errors: 0 > >>>>>>>>>> Total transferred: 33189975 bytes > >>>>>>>>>> HTML transferred: 33039975 bytes > >>>>>>>>>> Requests per second: 3.27 [#/sec] (mean) > >>>>>>>>>> Time per request: 15269.837 [ms] (mean) > >>>>>>>>>> Time per request: 305.397 [ms] (mean, across all > concurrent > >>>>>>>>>> requests) > >>>>>>>>>> Transfer rate: 212.26 [Kbytes/sec] received > >>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> Connection Times (ms) > >>>>>>>>>> min mean[+/-sd] median max > >>>>>>>>>> Connect: 0 2 6.6 0 30 > >>>>>>>>>> Processing: 11504 15083 1122.0 15065 19496 > >>>>>>>>>> Waiting: 214 1312 355.2 1294 2751 > >>>>>>>>>> Total: 11504 15086 1123.5 15065 19497 > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >>>>>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >>>>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Ofbiz on twitter: http://twitter.com/apache_ofbiz > >>>>> Myself on twitter: http://twitter.com/hansbak > >>>>> Antwebsystems.com: Quality services for competitive rates. > >>>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >
