Thanks Skip. It turns out my 11.04 already had this set.
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 9:46 AM, Skip <s...@thedevers.org> wrote: > Modify entityengine.xml to look like; > > <connection-factory > class="org.ofbiz.entity.connection.DBCPConnectionFactory"/> > <!-- <connection-factory > class="org.ofbiz.entity.connection.MinervaConnectionFactory"/> --> > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mike Z [mailto:mz4whee...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 28, 2013 12:07 AM > To: user@ofbiz.apache.org > Subject: RE: Obfiz 12.04 way slower than 9.x > > > Can you explain how you switched from minerva to dbcp? I also noticed a > drastic reduction in performance so you may have nailed down the cause. > Well done! > > Sent from my BlackBerry® PlayBook™ > www.blackberry.com > > ------------------------------ > *From:* "Skip" <s...@thedevers.org> > *To:* "user@ofbiz.apache.org" <user@ofbiz.apache.org> > *Sent:* June 27, 2013 3:53 PM > *Subject:* RE: Obfiz 12.04 way slower than 9.x > > For any who are interested, this turns out to be a problem using Minerva. > > I ran a profiler on both installations (both using Minerva) and a > significant part of the time spent in jdbc.ConnectionFactory.getConnection > was in org.apache.log4j.Logger.trace even though trace is turned off. > > This is really funny because the two ofbiz-minerva.jar files, the one from > 9.04 and the one from 12.04 look identical. I am guessing that the ofbiz > code that calls it is optimized to use DBCP because when I switched from > Minerva to DBCP, the execution times became nearly identical. > > > I ran Ofbiz for thousands of hours under Minerva and never had a problem > where I had LOTS of problems with DBCP back then (5 years ago). I am only > hoping that DBCP has been fixed. > > I see a similiar issues to what I had that were fixed by JIRA Ofbix-5122 > and > have noted that the patch has been applied to the version I have, so I am > hopeful. > > Skip > > -----Original Message----- > From: Skip [mailto:s...@thedevers.org] > Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:33 AM > To: user@ofbiz.apache.org > Subject: RE: Obfiz 12.04 way slower than 9.x > > > After some additional testing, 12.04 is an average of 5 times slower than > 9.04 across a range of services that use various entity engine calls. > > This has to be a configuration problem. Anyone have a pointer? > > Skip > > -----Original Message----- > From: Skip [mailto:s...@thedevers.org] > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2013 5:24 PM > To: OfbizUser > Subject: Obfiz 12.04 way slower than 9.x > > > I am trying to upgrade to 12.04. On a test machine I finally got it all > running. However, it all seems to drag in 12.04 as compared to version > 9.04 > or something. > > When I click on Entity Engine Maintenance, the entity list comes up > instantly in 9.04 and takes 12 seconds to render in 12.04. > > Although this customer does not use it, the home page in ecommerce comes up > instantly in 9.04 and takes the same 12 seconds in 12.04. (I am guessing > that this is because of the different handling of catagories because part > of > the page comes up instantly.) > > > I have this service that processes the inventory with a > findListIteratorByCondition and does a few findByPrimaryKeys on the list, > then writes a text file (no entity engine calls). This service takes 11 > seconds to run in 9.04 and 28 seconds in 12.04. This is almost 3 times > slower and this is entirely java code with no screen stuff. I also expect > that a significant portion of that time is in the disk io writing the the > text file, so I expect that the entity engine calls are something like 4 > times slower. > > This is on an 8 core machine with 64 gigs of memory and a really fast hard > disk array. > > I have the cache, debug and logging set the same. Both instances are using > the same postgres database except that the 12.04 is using postnew. Neither > instance has anything in the log at the conclusing, and both produce > exactly > the same results. > > Both ofbiz instances are running Minerva. > > I am getting ready to run a profiler on this to see where the slowdown is, > but maybe I do not have a setting right for production. > > Am I missing something? > > Skip > >
