Hi everybody, Just wanted to clarify an errata in the message I sent to Pierre.
I meant to say: "NO CONSENSUS" Everything else is good. As a complete novice to ofbiz and the ofbiz community, it seems a bit odd to me that there was and is such a heated debate about adding or not contributors, users of ofbiz, marketing, etc to the web page and whether it is a good idea or not and there isn't the same type of debate when it comes to adding features to the product that would: A) make ofbiz more attractive to a wider market B) make it that much easier for integrators, developers and even you guys to implement C) save everybody time in long run I'm probably just naive but from the outside, it's a bit perplexing, thats for sure. Regards Ed On 2/28/14 9:24 AM, "Pierre Smits" <pierre.sm...@gmail.com> wrote: >In a private email Eduardo (edsays73) said the following regarding the >screenshots I posted in the OFBIZ-5473: > >Hi Pierre! I saw them and they look spot on. I also see that there was >consensus on which direction take with the expenses. Which way have you >gone with this? > > >I will try to elaborate on what approach we followed when doing the >reference implementation. > >First of all, we started out with some blank pieces of paper and >registered >the scenario's that could and/or would apply. Subsequently we started >defining requirements, nice to haves and other kinds of wishes and tagged >these (together with the info of the scenarios) to business processes and >steps. Furthermore we assessed functions, features and other stuff in >trunk >for re-usage and took decisions. And presto-pronto: a reference >implementation was developed of which screenshots were taken. > >Regards, > >Pierre Smits > >*ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>* >Services & Solutions for Cloud- >Based Manufacturing, Professional >Services and Retail & Trade >http://www.orrtiz.com
