Sharan, as a committer, you have write access to these documents, they are at https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site/docs, the whole site is at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/ofbiz/site
Because of the possible importance of these documents (even if old), I began to review them in detail by section. They should be marked as Obsolete in
most case I guess, I will confirm below...
Here is my 1st attempt:
config_deploy_maint.html, this document is based on OFBiz 3.0!
Introduction
Building Blocks
Nothing, important can be discarded
Setting Up a Database
Obsolete, can be discarded
Downloading and Installing Java - java.sun.com
Obsolete, can be discarded
OFBiz
Getting OFBiz
Obsolete, we have better documents, can be discarded
Deploying & Configuring OFBiz
jndiservers.xml
Obsolete, we have better documents, can be discarded
entityengine.xml
Check the content, maybe not all is covered elsewhere (setup doc)
Servlet & JSP Container
Obsolete, can be discarded
Transaction Manager
Obsolete, can be discarded
Connection Pool
Obsolete, can be discarded
JMS Configuration
N/A, discard
URL Settings
We have better documents, can be discarded (content to be compared
to tech setup maybe)
Cache Settings & Analysis
We have better documents, can be discarded (content to be compared
to tech setup maybe)
Keeping Up With OFBiz
The rest is empty => discard!
Restarting versus Run-time Changable
The OFBiz WebTools
Performance & Reliability
eCommerce Specific
As you can see, we can neglect this document, I will do a review of others the
same way, but w/o as much comments, see below...
Le 04/09/2014 11:35, Jacques Le Roux a écrit :
I will have a look, hopefully "soon"...
Jacques
Le 25/08/2014 16:26, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
What would be your suggestion about existing documentation that refers to them?
- Should we remove the reference?
Yes I agree with Arian, better no documentation than a misleading one. People
should now that information there are Obsolete.
- Somehow flag the reference as potentially misleading and out of date?
- Create new descriptions that only deal with the part of te reference that
pertains to the subject in the referencing document?
Can someone who knows OfBiz, give an assessment of each of the docs about what are the problems with the HTML docs and what would it take to fix or
replace them with updated content?
Which ones are worth copying to the wiki?
config_deploy_maint.html
To me barked as Obsolete
control.html
To me barked as Obsolete
core.html
To me barked as Obsolete
coreconfig.html
To me barked as Obsolete
datafile.html
Not sure we have better information elsewhere in wiki...
entity.html
I will review later
entityconfig.html
I will review later
minilang.html
To me barked as Obsolete, we have up to date documentation in wiki
regions.html
To me barked as Obsolete
serviceconfig.html
I will review later
services.html
I will review later
taglib.html
To me barked as Obsolete
wf_cal_spec_chart.html
To me barked as Obsolete
workflow.html
To me barked as Obsolete
Jacques
Ron
On 25/08/2014 7:36 AM, Adrian Crum wrote:
Those documents are extremely old and consequently most of the information in them is wrong. It is nice to have them as a reference (so the good
bits of information can be copied to current docs), but they should not be displayed or referenced in any new documentation.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 8/25/2014 12:29 PM, Sharan-F wrote:
Hi
I've just come across some OFBiz Technical documentation that is stored
here.
http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs <http://ofbiz.apache.org/docs>
They are referenced by some of the documents and guides in the OFBTECH
Technical documentation. As part of the documentation review and
consolidation effort - do we need to look at reviewing these too and
eventually bring them across to the Wiki?
Thanks
Sharan
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/http-ofbiz-apache-org-docs-tp4654229.html
Sent from the OFBiz - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
