Hi Michael, All,
Why not Foundation?
It's true that Bootstrap, I guess due to its origin, is more widely used, but
Foundation has some arguments.
https://www.google.fr/search?q=Bootstrap+vs+Foundation&ie=UTF-8
Nnotably when it comes to tables that OFBiz uses a lot (please see Rajesh's and
my message before in the thread).
Beware, I don't mean to use Foundation as is, simply to refer to its CSS
definitions as Taher suggested for Bootstrap.
At least to compare both for OFBiz before picking one
Jacques
Le 07/09/2017 à 10:05, Michael Brohl a écrit :
A bit late to the party but I totally agree that we should make use of an
existing standard instead of reinventing our own wheel.
+1 for bootstrap
Regards,
Michael
Am 26.08.17 um 21:19 schrieb Taher Alkhateeb:
If I may suggest, I think we should go with something established and
not come up with our own CSS dictionary. So for example, we can
utilize pre-existing definitions from bootstrap [1]
[1] https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.3/css/#tables
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mayank Lambhate
<mayank.lambh...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote:
Hello All,
The tables used in OFBiz currently don`t have any standard for defining the
alignment of data inside the tables. IMO, following are the points relevant
to alignment of data in tables -
1. Numeric data (Right Aligned)
2. Non-Numeric (Left Aligned)
3. Table headers to be aligned with the data.
Also, the names of classes used for aligning data are a bit confusing. We
can come up with more generic names of the classes, also we can define
certain classes that could be specific to the alignment of data inside
tables.
Please let me know what you think about this.
Thanks and Regards
*Mayank Lambhate* | Enterprise Software Engineer
HotWax Systems <http://www.hotwaxsystems.com/>
