Why not just write your own custom xmlrpc server (perl/python/java) that accepts just the P/N and new price, searches for the current record, and performs a SQL call to update the DB.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:12 AM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com> wrote: > ERRATA: I meant "There is no parameter" in lieu of "There is parameter" > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 8:09 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > Hi Rishi , > > > > I am using XML RPC with OFBiz so my capabilities are limited to > > what the interface provides. There is parameter that allows me > > to specify the data format/pattern . > > > > At this moment i have solved my problem temporarily by appending > > .001 after the second part in HH:MM:SS and i am only using > > createProductPrice instead of updateProductPrice . As creating new > > prices allows to have a history/audit of prices. I feel > updateProductPrice > > is really overwriting the values and trail is lost. > > > > regds > > mallah. > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 6:49 PM, Rishi Solanki <rishisolan...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Idea of utility class is, use the format you would like and pass the > >> value. > >> It will convert into timestamp used in the table. In case you could not > >> get > >> the desired format in the utility class then the class uses the > >> java.text.SimpleDateFormat class to resolve its purpose. > >> > >> Please take a look at toTimestamp() method variations and format you are > >> receiving in the xml. Once you have the format with you, it can be > easily > >> converted into timestamp. Also if utility class does not support then go > >> to > >> core class for same i.e java.text.SimpleDateFormat and look for the > >> supporting format. > >> > >> HTH! > >> > >> > >> Rishi Solanki > >> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > >> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > >> Direct: +91-9893287847 > >> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > >> www.hotwax.co > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Rajesh Mallah <mallah.raj...@gmail.com > > > >> wrote: > >> > >> > Further Info: > >> > > >> > <member> > >> > <name>fromDate</name> > >> > <value> > >> > <string><![CDATA[2018-04-17 14:59:34.001 > +0530]]></string> > >> > </value> > >> > </member> > >> > > >> > In XML results in > >> > > >> > from_date | 2018-04-17 14:59:34.001+05:30 > >> > > >> > in DB. looks like the parser is kind enough to consider TZ > >> > spec without colons. > >> > > >> > > >> > regds > >> > mallah. > >> > > >> > > >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:42 PM, Rajesh Mallah < > mallah.raj...@gmail.com > >> > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > > >> > > Its PostgreSQL > >> > > regds > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > below is a sample data : > >> > > > >> > > SQL> select * from ofbiz.product_price where > >> > > product_id='PROD_SW52D5H3EN' order by created_date desc limit 1; > >> > > > >> > > -[ RECORD 1 ]---------------+------------------------------ > >> > > product_id | PROD_SW52D5H3EN > >> > > product_price_type_id | DEFAULT_PRICE > >> > > product_price_purpose_id | PURCHASE > >> > > currency_uom_id | INR > >> > > product_store_group_id | _NA_ > >> > > from_date | 2018-04-17 12:49:20+05:30 <---- > This > >> has > >> > > been put by me. > >> > > thru_date | > >> > > price | 121.000 > >> > > term_uom_id | WT_kg > >> > > custom_price_calc_service | > >> > > price_without_tax | > >> > > price_with_tax | > >> > > tax_amount | > >> > > tax_percentage | > >> > > tax_auth_party_id | > >> > > tax_auth_geo_id | > >> > > tax_in_price | Y > >> > > created_date | 2018-04-17 12:49:20.416+05:30 > >> > > created_by_user_login | admin > >> > > last_modified_date | 2018-04-17 12:49:20.416+05:30 > >> > > last_modified_by_user_login | admin > >> > > last_updated_stamp | 2018-04-17 12:49:20.416+05:30 <---- > >> > > Generated by defaults. > >> > > last_updated_tx_stamp | 2018-04-17 12:49:20.357+05:30 > >> > > created_stamp | 2018-04-17 12:49:20.416+05:30 > >> > > created_tx_stamp | 2018-04-17 12:49:20.357+05:30 > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:39 PM, Deepak Dixit > >> > <deepak.dixit@hotwaxsystems. > >> > > com> wrote: > >> > > > >> > >> Hi Rajesh, > >> > >> > >> > >> Could you please share which database you are using? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks & Regards > >> > >> -- > >> > >> Deepak Dixit > >> > >> www.hotwax.co > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:36 PM, Rajesh Mallah < > >> mallah.raj...@gmail.com > >> > > > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi , > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > it was in conversion/DateTimeConverters.java that was appending > >> '.0' > >> > to > >> > >> > the > >> > >> > end of > >> > >> > string if the string did not contain any decimals. So i have now > >> > >> started > >> > >> > sending > >> > >> > the fractional seconds. And things are better (if not perfect). > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > public java.sql.Timestamp convert(String obj, Locale locale, > >> TimeZone > >> > >> > timeZone, String formatString) throws ConversionException { > >> > >> > String str = obj.trim(); > >> > >> > if (str.length() == 0) { > >> > >> > return null; > >> > >> > } > >> > >> > DateFormat df = null; > >> > >> > if (UtilValidate.isEmpty(formatString)) { > >> > >> > // These hacks are a bad idea, but they are > >> included > >> > >> > // for backward compatibility. > >> > >> > if (str.length() > 0 && !str.contains(":")) { > >> > >> > str = str + " 00:00:00.00"; > >> > >> > } > >> > >> > // hack to mimic Timestamp.valueOf() method > >> > >> > if (str.length() > 0 && !str.contains(".")) { > >> > >> > str = str + ".0"; > >> > >> > } else { > >> > >> > // DateFormat has a funny way of parsing > >> > >> milliseconds: > >> > >> > // 00:00:00.2 parses to 00:00:00.002 > >> > >> > // so we'll add zeros to the end to get > >> > 00:00:00.200 > >> > >> > String[] timeSplit = str.split("[.]"); > >> > >> > if (timeSplit.length > 1 && > >> timeSplit[1].length() > >> > < > >> > >> 3) > >> > >> > { > >> > >> > str = str + "000".substring(timeSplit[1]. > >> > >> > length()); > >> > >> > } > >> > >> > } > >> > >> > df = > >> > >> > UtilDateTime.toDateTimeFormat(UtilDateTime.getDateTimeFormat(), > >> > >> timeZone, > >> > >> > locale); > >> > >> > } else { > >> > >> > df = UtilDateTime.toDateTimeFormat(formatString, > >> > >> timeZone, > >> > >> > locale); > >> > >> > } > >> > >> > try { > >> > >> > return new java.sql.Timestamp(df.parse( > >> > str).getTime()); > >> > >> > } catch (ParseException e) { > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:19 PM, Rajesh Mallah < > >> > mallah.raj...@gmail.com > >> > >> > > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > >> > > Thanks Rishi. > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 2:08 PM, Rishi Solanki < > >> > >> rishisolan...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> UtilDateTime is the utility class, add the time format support > >> you > >> > >> want > >> > >> > >> and > >> > >> > >> use it. Most format supported by this utility class OFBiz > have. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Rishi Solanki > >> > >> > >> Sr Manager, Enterprise Software Development > >> > >> > >> HotWax Systems Pvt. Ltd. > >> > >> > >> Direct: +91-9893287847 > >> > >> > >> http://www.hotwaxsystems.com > >> > >> > >> www.hotwax.co > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Rajesh Mallah < > >> > >> > mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Now I am passing "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30" as fromDate , > >> > >> > >> > Which is the value picked up from the DB column. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > Even at XML level the string is preserved , but at some > stage > >> > after > >> > >> > >> > hitting tomcat it becomes: "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30.0" > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > which is not parseable. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > |W| [ModelService.makeValid] : Type conversion of field > >> > >> [fromDate] to > >> > >> > >> type > >> > >> > >> > [java.sql.Timestamp] failed f > >> > >> > >> > or value "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30": > >> > >> > >> > org.apache.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException: > >> > >> > java.text.ParseException: > >> > >> > >> > Unparseable date: "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30.0" > >> > >> > (java.text.ParseExceptio > >> > >> > >> > n: Unparseable date: "2018-04-17 12:09:17+05:30.0") > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > <!--- snippet from the XML-RPC --> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > <member> > >> > >> > >> > <name>fromDate</name> > >> > >> > >> > <value> > >> > >> > >> > <string><![CDATA[2018-04-17 > >> > >> 12:09:17+05:30]]></string> > >> > >> > >> > </value> > >> > >> > >> > </member> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > <!-- end of snippet --> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > regds > >> > >> > >> > mallah. > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:08 AM, Rajesh Mallah < > >> > >> > >> mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > >> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > Hello Mr Deepak , > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > Thanks for the response . The record does exists but i > guess > >> > >> > >> > > i am not specifying the params good enough to hit the > record > >> > >> > >> > > by pkey. > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > I wish there were a "product_price_id" in ProductPrice > >> entity. > >> > >> :-) > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > regds > >> > >> > >> > > mallah. > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 9:58 AM, Deepak Dixit < > >> > >> > deepak.di...@hotwax.co > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Rajesh, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> If you want to create product price you should use > >> > >> > createProductPrice > >> > >> > >> > >> service, > >> > >> > >> > >> https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apac > >> he.org/webtools/control/Servic > >> > >> > >> > >> eList?sel_service_name=createProductPrice > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> If productPrice record already exists you should use > >> > >> > >> updateProductPrice, > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks & Regards > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> > >> > >> > >> Deepak Dixit > >> > >> > >> > >> Director of Product Engineering > >> > >> > >> > >> HotWax Commerce <https://hotwax.co/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 11:42 PM, Rajesh Mallah < > >> > >> > >> > mallah.raj...@gmail.com> > >> > >> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > Hi , > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > I am calling > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > https://demo-stable.ofbiz.apache.org/webtools/control/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > ServiceList?sel_service_name=updateProductPrice > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > with ARGS > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > { > >> > >> > >> > >> > currencyUomId "INR", > >> > >> > >> > >> > fromDate "2018-04-16 17:39:52", > >> > >> > >> > >> > price 150, > >> > >> > >> > >> > productId "PROD_SW52D5H3EN", > >> > >> > >> > >> > productPricePurposeId "PURCHASE", > >> > >> > >> > >> > productPriceTypeId "DEFAULT_PRICE", > >> > >> > >> > >> > productStoreGroupId "_NA_", > >> > >> > >> > >> > taxInPrice "Y", > >> > >> > >> > >> > termUomId "WT_kg" > >> > >> > >> > >> > } > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > I am getting error: > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > faultString:Error running the simple-method: Entity > value > >> > not > >> > >> > found > >> > >> > >> > with > >> > >> > >> > >> > name: lookedUpValue Method = updateProductPrice, File = > >> > >> > >> > >> > file:/opt/ofbiz/apache-ofbiz-1 > >> 6.11.04/applications/product/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > minilang/product/price/PriceServices.xml, > >> > >> > >> > >> > Element = <set-nonpk-fields>, Line 69null > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > the minilang def is reproduced here for convinience: > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > <simple-method method-name="updateProductPrice" > >> > >> > >> > >> short-description="Update > >> > >> > >> > >> > an ProductPrice"> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <set field="callingMethodName" > >> > >> > value="updateProductPrice"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <set field="checkAction" value="UPDATE"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <call-simple-method method-name=" > >> > >> > >> > checkProductRelatedPermission" > >> > >> > >> > >> > xml-resource="component://product/minilang/product/ > >> > >> > >> > >> > product/ProductServices.xml"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <check-permission > permission="CATALOG_PRICE_MAIN > >> T"> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <fail-property resource="ProductUiLabels" > >> > >> > >> > >> > property="ProductPriceMaintPermissionError"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > </check-permission> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <check-errors/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > <call-simple-method method-name=" > >> > >> > >> > inlineHandlePriceWithTaxInclud > >> > >> > >> > >> > ed"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > <entity-one entity-name="ProductPrice" > >> > >> > >> > >> > value-field="lookedUpValue"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > <!-- grab the old price value before setting > >> nonpk > >> > >> > >> parameter > >> > >> > >> > >> fields > >> > >> > >> > >> > --> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <field-to-result field="lookedUpValue.price" > >> > >> > >> > >> > result-name="oldPrice"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > <set-nonpk-fields map="parameters" > >> > >> > >> > value-field="lookedUpValue"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > <now-timestamp field="nowTimestamp"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <set field="lookedUpValue.lastModifiedDate" > >> > >> > >> > >> > from-field="nowTimestamp"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > <set field="lookedUpValue.lastModif > >> iedByUserLogin" > >> > >> > >> > >> > from-field="userLogin.userLoginId"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > <store-value value-field="lookedUpValue"/> > >> > >> > >> > >> > </simple-method> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > The productID does exists in Entity ProductPrice > >> > >> > >> > >> > Where am I going wrong ? > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > thanks & regds > >> > >> > >> > >> > Rajesh Mallah. > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > > > >
