Hi Cameron,

Were you able to edit the filemgr lucene catalog?
I think if you update an index with Luke it would write out a version that
can't be read by an older Solr/Lucene version.
I remember Ricky trying to edit the filemgr catalog with Luke and faced the
above issue.

On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Cameron Goodale <[email protected]> wrote:

> Tom,
>
> You could use lucene's Luke tool to query and edit the catalog. Paul and I
> discovered a scripting plugin within Luke that can execute javascript to
> manipulate the catalog.
>
> I hope that is a good lead for you.
>
> Cameron
> On Jul 16, 2012 8:26 AM, "Thomas Bennett" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've recently created a Lucene file manager catalog. I cataloged about
>> 2000 files "in place", but have encountered a problem.
>>
>> From the fmbrowser some of the files are listed as being:
>>
>> Product        Transfer Status    Percent Complete Received Time
>> References    Metadata
>> 1287587805.h5 RECEIVED     100%         UNKNOWN        View References
>>   View Metadata
>> 1287353769.h5 RECEIVED    *0%*                 UNKNOWN        View
>> References     View Metadata
>> 1287355996.h5 RECEIVED    *0%*                 UNKNOWN        View
>> References     View Metadata
>> 1287425397.h5 RECEIVED     100%         UNKNOWN        View References
>>   View Metadata
>>
>> The problem lies with the two products that show % complete being 0%.
>>
>> When I use fmprod to download the product:
>>
>> wget
>> http://..../fmprod/data?productID=26b9cb0b-c5dd-11e1-bb9f-036596780c6e<http://kat-archive.kat.ac.za:8983/fmprod/data?productID=26b9cb0b-c5dd-11e1-bb9f-036596780c6e>
>>
>> I get:
>> HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 500 Internal Server Error
>> 2012-07-14 20:20:38 ERROR 500: Internal Server Error.
>>
>> So I'd like to "edit" the lucene catalog to update this piece of metadata
>> to reflect that the % complete is 100. Are there any tools available to do
>> this?
>>
>> Also at some point I must figure out why its happening :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Tom
>>
>


-- 
-Sheryl

Reply via email to