Hi, You can put the ResourceManager's address in place of the JobTracker (this actually works in Oozie 3 as well). I had created OOZIE-1508<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-1508> to better document this.
Another thing that we could do to make it more clear is to add a new schema version for each action to allow either a <job-tracker> or a <resource-manager> (though Oozie would still treat them the same, so it wouldn't really matter which one you used). I imagine that in the long run, we'll drop support for Hadoop 1.x, in which case newer schema versions wouldn't allow <job-tracker> at all. On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 11:38 AM, <mpeters...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am in the processing of moving to Hadoop 2 and have Oozie 4.0 installed. > > From the Oozie 4.0 docs, the Oozie workflow.xml doc still wants > "jobTracker" defined. But hasn't the concept of Job Tracker been removed > from Hadoop 2 in favor of Resource Manager and Application Master? > > Two questions: > - why has "jobTracker" been retained in Oozie 4.0? will it eventually go > away? > - what is the oozie "jobTracker" variable supposed to point to in a Hadoop > 2 cluster? > > Thanks, > Michael >
