On Wed, 16 Dec 2020 at 12:50, K. Kamhamea <kamha...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> In summary two conclusions can be drawn, right? > 1. There is no need to use courn if your server uses a unique public IP. > this is false assumption According to my tests since WebRTC is P2P The client IP should be accessible to KMS So TURN is not necessary as long as the server AND all client IP addresses are public And there are no routers FW etc. in the middle .... > 2. You can run a OM Server in a private network with only one public IP > using coturn. > --- That's cool !!! > And probably it is even necessary to use coturn if your OM server resides > on a cloud that doesn't provide such a service. > > Thank You so much for the link. > K > > Am Di., 15. Dez. 2020 um 22:43 Uhr schrieb Ali Alhaidary < > ali.alhaid...@the5stars.org>: > >> https://www.callstats.io/blog/2017/10/26/webrtc-product-turn-server >> >> >> On 12/15/20 5:05 PM, K. Kamhamea wrote: >> > I wonder why we need a coturn anyway? >> > >> > 1. SSL certificates can be installed without it >> > 2. The server URL can be written without port number (meaning it can >> > be accessed by the default 433 port) without turn server installed >> > the simple iptables command does the trick >> > >> > iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 443 -j REDIRECT --to-port >> > 5443 >> > >> > and changing server.xml to the default port doesn't work anyway (with >> > or without turn server) >> > >> > It think better avoid turn server as it may slow down the >> > communication further. >> > -- Best regards, Maxim
