First of all, WebSphere comes with session replication out of the box (at least 
in WAS enterprise).
I have WAS 8.0.0.6 running in a clustered environment with session replication 
without any issues (oki, there is one: delta-replication is not usable for all 
scenarios. But that's actually more a servlet spec issue).

Which exact version of WAS do you use?


LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>
>To: [email protected] 
>Cc: Mark Struberg <[email protected]> 
>Sent: Wednesday, 27 November 2013, 18:18
>Subject: Re: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped
> 
>
>
>Hi
>I was also thinking of how to enterpret that sentence... 
>How can I verify or get more information on the actual WebSphere configuration 
>when it comes to failover and so on? 
>On Nov 27, 2013 6:06 PM, "Joseph Bergmark" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>I think a key piece on information on that page is this sentence "Properties 
>that are not listed below, such as those that control the lifecycle and 
>services, should remain at the default value for the application server."
>>
>>
>>In other words you should not overwrite the FailOverService or ContextService 
>>that are integrated into the application server run time.
>>
>>
>>
>>On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> 
>>wrote:
>>
>>Hi Mark
>>>
>>>
>>>We run WebSphere 8.5, if I understand the WebSphere documentation the 
>>>bundled OWB does use the default configuration for most of the parameters 
>>>(except for the ones specified on 
>>>http://pic.dhe.ibm.com/infocenter/wasinfo/v8r0/index.jsp?topic=%2Fcom.ibm.websphere.nd.multiplatform.doc%2Finfo%2Fae%2Fae%2Frweb_cdi_customprops.html).
>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>>So the default implementation will move all context information to the 
>>>HttpSession and let the container (WebSphere in our case) decide how/where 
>>>to store the context?
>>>
>>>
>>>When using the FailOverService I assume you cannot hold the contexts in 
>>>memory or? How does that work?
>>>
>>>
>>>Is there any other implementation of the ContextService or examples on how 
>>>to modify/implement our own (most for learning I would assume....)
>>>
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>Lars-Fredrik
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 7:04 AM, Mark Struberg <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Hi Lars!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Our storages can be changed easily. It depends on the ContextsService SPI 
>>>>implementation which is being used. By default in native OWB we hold all 
>>>>the contexts in memory for better performance. Of course we do observe 
>>>>session passivation and on willPassivate store the context over into the 
>>>>session.
>>>>
>>>>If you mean to create a clustered environment, then there is also an own 
>>>>FailOverService which you can activate by simply adding the 
>>>>openwebbeans-clustering module.
>>>>
>>>>What is your exact operation environment? TomEE, Geronimo, WebSphere, 
>>>>Tomcat, Jetty, standalone, ...? OWB is already used in quite a few 
>>>>containers and this topic is also depending on the owb version + the 
>>>>integration scenario in the container.
>>>>
>>>>LieGrue,
>>>>strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>________________________________
>>>>> From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]>
>>>>>To: [email protected]
>>>>>Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 23:41
>>>>>Subject: @SessionScoped and @ConversionScoped
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Hi!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>I assume that both @SesionScoped and @ConversationScoped beans store their 
>>>>>data in the HttpSession? If not how is this handled?
>>>>>Is there any (preferred) way of changing where data is stored? E.g. under 
>>>>>certain circumstances store data in a DB rather than in the HttpSession 
>>>>>(to make it available to other containers).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards
>>>>>Lars-Fredrik
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>--
>>>>>Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>>>>>
>>>>>Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>>>>
>>>>>STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>>>>>The information contained in this electronic message and any
>>>>>attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>>>>>address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>>>>>you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>>>>immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this
>>>>>message and any attachments.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards
>>>
>>>Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>>
>>>STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY:
>>>The information contained in this electronic message and any
>>>attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the
>>>address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If
>>>you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg
>>>immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this 
>>>message and any attachments. 
>>
>
>

Reply via email to