I generally question logger injection. It's just way too slow in the end anyway
LieGrue, strub >________________________________ > From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Monday, 9 December 2013, 23:29 >Subject: Re: Reinject of transient dependencies? + Question on >@ConversationScoped > > > >Hi Mark >I was just wondering since some CDI examples (especially those that inject a >Logger that is not proxyable) suggest injecting it to a transient field in a >passivation scope bean.... I guess those examples are not right then? >Hi! > >Nope, we do not re-inject anything. >The parts which do not get serialized are lost. > >You could of course handle serialisation yourself and fill the injection point >with BeanManager#getReference manually. But what for? > >LieGrue, >strub > > > > > > > >>________________________________ >> From: Lars-Fredrik Smedberg <[email protected]> >>To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>Sent: Monday, 9 December 2013, 13:49 >>Subject: Reinject of transient dependencies? + Question on @ConversationScoped >> >> >> >>Hi! >> >> >>Some questions if anyone can help me out: >> >> >>1. In the case of passivation and activation will OWB reinject transient >>dependencies or how are they treated? >>2. Is there any (easy) way to use @ConversationScoped in a none >>JSF-environment or should I use something else (or perhaps create a custom >>scope)? >> >> >> >>Regards >>Lars-Fredrik >> >>-- >>Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >> >>Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> >>STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >>The information contained in this electronic message and any >>attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >>address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >>you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >>message and any attachments. >> >> > > >
