Thanks Romain.... then I will submit a bugreport.... /Fredrik
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> wrote: > Iirc aroundinvoke was supported since the beginning > Le 8 nov. 2014 14:05, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > @Romain >> >> I know WAS uses OWB and, as you say, some obsolete version. >> >> I was just curios in what CDI and OWB version the support was added. If I >> try to bug report something that is not in Java EE 6 I will get the cold >> hand I guess :) >> >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> It is in tomee and by spec. No idea in WAS which has obsolete versions >>> Le 8 nov. 2014 13:47, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a >>> écrit : >>> >>> Hi! >>>> >>>> As I can see JSR318 contains two specifications, EJB 3.1 Specification >>>> and Interceptors 1.1 (and later on Interceptors 1.2 MR) >>>> >>>> EJB 3.1 as well as Interceptors 1.1 are included in Java EE6. >>>> Interceptors 1.2 is included in Javav EE7. >>>> >>>> When I look in Inteceptors Specification 1.1 I find no references to a >>>> specific CDI version or to CDI at all. >>>> >>>> When I look in Interceptors Specification 1.2 I see the following: >>>> >>>> *1.2 Relationship to Other Specifications* >>>> >>>> "...and the CDI specification requires support for the chapters 2,3 and >>>> 5 (excluding 5.5)." >>>> >>>> CDI specification here points to "JSR346 - Context and Dependency >>>> Injection for the Java EE Platform 1.1 (CDI specification)" >>>> >>>> *2.7 Timeout Method Inteceptors* >>>> >>>> "Interceptor methods that interpose on timeout methods are denoted by >>>> the AroundTimeout annotation." >>>> >>>> "Around-timeout methods can have public, private, protected or package >>>> level access. An around-timeout method must not be declared as abstract, >>>> final or static." >>>> >>>> Question: >>>> >>>> 1) From the Interceptors 1.2 I understand that @AroundInvoke is okay to >>>> use with a CDI interceptor using CDI 1.1, correct? >>>> 2) What about CDI 1.0 (JSR 299) and Interceptors 1.1, is @AroundInvoke >>>> also okay with CDI 1.0? I find no information on that? >>>> >>>> The reason I ask is that I do not get it to work with WebSphere 8.5.5 >>>> that uses OWB (with a version that atleast should support CDI 1.0). >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Lars-Fredrik >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >>>> >>>> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>>> >>>> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >>>> The information contained in this electronic message and any >>>> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >>>> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >>>> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >>>> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >>>> message and any attachments. >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards >> >> Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> >> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: >> The information contained in this electronic message and any >> attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the >> address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If >> you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg >> immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this >> message and any attachments. >> > -- Med vänlig hälsning / Best regards Lars-Fredrik Smedberg STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY: The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the address(es) and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify Lars-Fredrik Smedberg immediately at [email protected], and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments.
