Are you calling get() on the Instance with each request (or whatever0 that comes into this bean?
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 1:13 PM Karl Kildén <[email protected]> wrote: > To explain myself further ALL I had on my heap was my > Instance<MyInterface>... and gc released 0.5% memory :) > > I had 200 000 of them at least. They where supposed to be four singletons. > My idea was inject into @ApplicationScoped and omit to give them scope > because they will be @ApplicationScoped anyways... Seems every invocation > of my @ApplicationScoped bean recreated all instances. > > What I had was unrecoverable mem leak. Now I could be doing something > stupid or Instance<MyInterface> has a problem or something else... > > Cheers > > > > On 27 February 2015 at 19:05, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> If dependent it will be kept in enclosing bean. >> Le 27 févr. 2015 19:00, "Lars-Fredrik Smedberg" <[email protected]> a >> écrit : >> >> So does this mean that there will be a memory leak in the case Karl >>> described? >>> >>> I have used similar constructs before so im curios (@Inject @Provider >>> <some dep scoped bean> in an @ApplicationScoped bean and called get () on >>> the injected provider). >>> >>> I thought for a while that it might get garbage collected when the >>> created bean is outof scope or maybe then there is no way for @PreDestroy >>> to be called? >>> >>> Regards >>> LF >>> >>> I thought that the created dep scoped bean would be >>> On Feb 27, 2015 6:07 PM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yes. >>>> >>>> Will be destoyed with the bean where it is injected IIRC so the app >>>> here. >>>> Le 27 févr. 2015 16:59, <[email protected]> a écrit : >>>> >>>>> Hello! I have a bean with @ApplicationScoped. When I inject >>>>> Instance<MyInterface> instance and my actual beans implementing MyInstance >>>>> are dependentscoped they get recreated over and over and are not gc'd. >>>>> >>>>> Expected behavior? >>>>> >>>>> Cheers >>>> >>>> >
