Romain, the craftmanship seems incredible as always. Meecro is really well
designed from what I can tell so far. But I am a mere mortal and need docs
to get servers to run :)


   - I do find it odd that javase code like the bake stuff can't run in a
   main method in intellij.
      -  If that is the case, then surely we most doc this with a sample.
   - Following your guide, I setup some maven plugins and could run the Cli
   class. Very convenient. For production purposes I think I would prefer the
   assembly, that works fine too.


>From intellij, I tried some exec stuff and did a run configuration with the
provided dependencies checked. Simply exec:java with my Bake main
configured in pom. I had the same issue as when starting directly from
intellij however... Same exception: Caused by:
java.lang.NullPointerException: Cannot invoke
"org.apache.webbeans.corespi.scanner.xbean.OwbAnnotationFinder.getArchive()"
because the return value of
"org.apache.webbeans.web.scanner.WebScannerService.getFinder()" is null


While running the app from maven only is acceptable since development is
test driven anyways, I still feel like we need super crisp documentation in
the form of a sample with some readme.

Thanks for the help!

My additions based on your tips are pushed:
https://github.com/karlkilden/openwebbeans-meecrowave-examples

cheers


mån 19 okt. 2020 kl. 18:17 skrev Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>:

> @Karl: I see, so to run from intellij you should....do nothing :D
> Joke apart, add commons-cli in scope provided (or compile/optional
> depending if you want it or not at the end), select the main class from
> meecrowave-core "Cli" and run :)
>
> Tip: ensure "include provided dependencies" checkbox is checked in
> Application configuration in idea.
>
> If you really want to run your main because it has some more logic, you
> can use maven exec plugin and in intellij configuration the same trick will
> work.
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le lun. 19 oct. 2020 à 18:09, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> a
> écrit :
>
>> To clarify, I assume you are supposed to be able to run it from intellij
>> during development? E.g. run the main method like you always do.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 18:07, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Romain for the suggestion,
>>>
>>> What commands did you use? Maven package and meecrowave:run works fine,
>>> but I have not yet gotten to configure a maven plugin to run the Start
>>> class with a main method.
>>>
>>> meecrowave:run, can I annotate port somehow when I run that? 8080 is
>>> busy over here with something I don't want to restart.
>>>
>>> On Mon, 19 Oct 2020 at 17:24, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> tested with maven and got no issue, here what you can check/try: do you
>>>> use maven embedded in intellij (never do ;) and use a real maven 3.5 or 
>>>> 3.6)
>>>>
>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github
>>>> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn
>>>> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>>>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Le lun. 19 oct. 2020 à 17:20, Karl Kildén <[email protected]> a
>>>> écrit :
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> So when getting to know Meecro I just added the sample bake into the
>>>>> rest trivial and tried to run it in Intellij.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/karlkilden/openwebbeans-meecrowave-examples/commit/15ceab392683adf356e103c1d1c8fc66139b862e
>>>>>
>>>>> stacktrace and code above.
>>>>>
>>>>> Anything I am missing?
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> Karl
>>>>>
>>>>

Reply via email to