Ah, too late, I'm afraid. I dropped it.
James
On 11/09/15 11:41, [email protected] wrote:
James,
It should be in building state. Can you check what's the state of it?
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:04 PM, James Heather
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi Rajeshbabu,
Thanks--yes--I've done that. I'm now recreating the index with a
long timeout.
I reported it because it seemed to me to be a bug: Phoenix thinks
that the index is there, but it's not. It ought to get cleaned up
after a timeout.
James
On 11/09/15 11:32, [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> wrote:
Hi James,
You can drop the partially created index and try following steps
1) Add the following property to hbase-site.xml at phoenix client
side.
<property>
<name>phoenix.query.timeoutMs</name>
<value>double of default value</value>
</property>
2) Export the HBASE_CONF_PATH with the configuration directory
where hbase-site.xml present.
3) then start sqlline.py command prompt
4) Then run create index query.
Thanks,
Rajeshbabu.
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 3:26 PM, James Heather
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
I just tried to create an index on a column for a table with
200M rows. Creating the index timed out:
0: jdbc:phoenix:172.31.31.143> CREATE INDEX idx_lastname ON
loadtest.testing (lastname);
Error: Operation timed out (state=TIM01,code=6000)
java.sql.SQLTimeoutException: Operation timed out
at
org.apache.phoenix.exception.SQLExceptionCode$14.newException(SQLExceptionCode.java:314)
at
org.apache.phoenix.exception.SQLExceptionInfo.buildException(SQLExceptionInfo.java:133)
I bumped up the timeout and tried again, but it failed, and
it tells me the index already exists:
0: jdbc:phoenix:172.31.31.143> CREATE INDEX idx_lastname ON
loadtest.testing (lastname);
Error: ERROR 1013 (42M04): Table already exists.
tableName=LOADTEST.IDX_LASTNAME (state=42M04,code=1013)
org.apache.phoenix.schema.TableAlreadyExistsException: ERROR 1013
(42M04): Table already exists. tableName=LOADTEST.IDX_LASTNAME
at
org.apache.phoenix.schema.MetaDataClient.createTableInternal(MetaDataClient.java:1692)
at
org.apache.phoenix.schema.MetaDataClient.createIndex(MetaDataClient.java:1118)
at
org.apache.phoenix.compile.CreateIndexCompiler$1.execute(CreateIndexCompiler.java:95)
at
org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixStatement$2.call(PhoenixStatement.java:280)
at
org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixStatement$2.call(PhoenixStatement.java:272)
at org.apache.phoenix.call.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:53)
at
org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixStatement.executeMutation(PhoenixStatement.java:271)
at
org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixStatement.execute(PhoenixStatement.java:1063)
at sqlline.Commands.execute(Commands.java:822)
at sqlline.Commands.sql(Commands.java:732)
at sqlline.SqlLine.dispatch(SqlLine.java:808)
at sqlline.SqlLine.begin(SqlLine.java:681)
at sqlline.SqlLine.start(SqlLine.java:398)
at sqlline.SqlLine.main(SqlLine.java:292)
0: jdbc:phoenix:172.31.31.143> !indexes loadtest.testing
+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------------------------------------+------------+---------------------------+
| TABLE_CAT |
TABLE_SCHEM | TABLE_NAME |
NON_UNIQUE | INDEX_QUALIFIER | INDEX_NAME
| TYPE | ORDINAL_POSIT |
+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------------------------------------+------------+---------------------------+
| | LOADTEST
| TESTING | true
| | IDX_LASTNAME
| 3 | 1 |
| | LOADTEST
| TESTING | true
| | IDX_LASTNAME
| 3 | 2 |
+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------------------------------------+------------+---------------------------+
0: jdbc:phoenix:172.31.31.143>
Is this a bug? I don't really see how the index can be in a
usable state. If I 'explain' a query that ought to use the
index, it tells me it's going to do a full scan anyway.
James
