Shouldn't be a big challenge, the friction for porting back patches from a 1.1 based tree to a 1.0 based tree will be low. The exception will be anything touching Region/HRegion but those differences can be mostly handled with simple substitution.
For CDH users, note there's also https://github.com/chiastic-security/phoenix-for-cloudera, which has branches for the last two releases, should be informally maintained by the Phoenix community for a while, and lets you build Phoenix release binary compatible with CDH's version of HBase. On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:31 PM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> wrote: > Until the CDH distro moves off of 1.0, we'll likely want to continue > releasing Phoenix on top of it (even if there are no further HBase 1.0 > releases). That's assuming our CDH Phoenix users want the new features and > bug fixes we're developing. > > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> That's my understanding as well. >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 10:56 AM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> FYI, HBase has recently decided to discontinue the 1.0.x line. I believe >>> the pending 1.0.3 release is expected to be the last. >>> >>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:36 AM, James Taylor <jamestay...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for letting us know, Anirudha & James. Makes sense to keep the >>>> 1.0 branch going in light of this hard dependency you have. >>>> >>>> James >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Anirudha Khanna < >>>> akha...@marinsoftware.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Same for us, we are also using CDH5 and it would be a big setback if >>>>> HBase-1.0 support is stopped by the community. >>>>> >>>>> Anirudha >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 12:01 PM, James Heather < >>>>> james.heat...@mendeley.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We're using CDH5, which runs HBase 1.0. >>>>>> >>>>>> I think it would kill the whole Phoenix project for us if there were >>>>>> no 1.0 support. >>>>>> >>>>>> James >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 19/09/15 01:53, James Taylor wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> +user list >>>>>> >>>>>> Please let us know if you're counting on HBase 1.0 support given that >>>>>> we have HBase 1.1 support. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> James >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Nick Dimiduk <ndimi...@apache.org> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Seems like a better question for the users mailing list. Probably it >>>>>>> depends on where the vendors are going, if there will be a >>>>>>> long-running >>>>>>> 1.0.x release line, we should keep it around. From Apache >>>>>>> perspective, it's >>>>>>> probably fine to drop 1.0.x in favor of 1.1.x. HBase 1.2 is right >>>>>>> around >>>>>>> the corner too... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 4:42 PM, James Taylor < >>>>>>> <jamestay...@apache.org>jamestay...@apache.org> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > Given that we have Phoenix support for HBase 1.1, does anyone feel >>>>>>> like we >>>>>>> > need to continue with Phoenix releases for HBase 1.0? >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > Thanks, >>>>>>> > James >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Best regards, >> >> - Andy >> >> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein >> (via Tom White) >> > > -- Best regards, - Andy Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein (via Tom White)
