Looks like lock goes away 30 minutes after index region split.
So i can assume that this issue comes from cache that configured by this 
option: phoenix.coprocessor.maxMetaDataCacheTimeToLiveMs



> On 21 Sep 2018, at 00:15, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> And how this split looks at Master logs:
> 
> Sep 20 19:45:04 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:04,888 INFO  
> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t282] master.RegionStates: Transition 
> {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 state=OPEN, ts=1537304859509, 
> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 
> state=SPLITTING, ts=1537461904888, server=prod
> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,340 INFO  
> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Transition 
> {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 state=SPLITTING, ts=1537461905340, 
> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 
> state=SPLIT, ts=1537461905340, server=pro
> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,340 INFO  
> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Offlined 
> 3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986 from prod013,60020,1537304282885
> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,341 INFO  
> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Transition 
> {33cba925c7acb347ac3f5e70e839c3cb state=SPLITTING_NEW, ts=1537461905340, 
> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {33cba925c7acb347ac3f5e70e839c3cb 
> state=OPEN, ts=1537461905341, server=
> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,341 INFO  
> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.RegionStates: Transition 
> {acb8f16a004a894c8706f6e12cd26144 state=SPLITTING_NEW, ts=1537461905340, 
> server=prod013,60020,1537304282885} to {acb8f16a004a894c8706f6e12cd26144 
> state=OPEN, ts=1537461905341, server=
> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,343 INFO  
> [AM.ZK.Worker-pool5-t284] master.AssignmentManager: Handled SPLIT event; 
> parent=IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986.,
>  daughter a=IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1
> Sep 20 19:47:41 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:47:41,972 INFO  
> [prod001,60000,1537304851459_ChoreService_2] balancer.StochasticLoadBalancer: 
> Skipping load balancing because balanced cluster; total cost is 
> 17.82282205608522, sum multiplier is 1102.0 min cost which need balance is 
> 0.05
> Sep 20 19:47:42 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:47:42,021 INFO  
> [prod001,60000,1537304851459_ChoreService_1] hbase.MetaTableAccessor: Deleted 
> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986.
> Sep 20 19:47:42 prod001 hbase[10838]: 2018-09-20 19:47:42,022 INFO  
> [prod001,60000,1537304851459_ChoreService_1] master.CatalogJanitor: Scanned 
> 779 catalog row(s), gc'd 0 unreferenced merged region(s) and 1 unreferenced 
> parent region(s)
> 
>> On 20 Sep 2018, at 21:43, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Looks like problem was because of index region split
>> 
>> Index region split at prod013:
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,441 INFO  
>> [regionserver/prod013/10.0.0.13:60020-splits-1537400010677] 
>> regionserver.SplitRequest: Region split, hbase:meta updated, and report to 
>> master. 
>> Parent=IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986.,
>>  new regions: 
>> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1537461904877.33cba925c7acb347ac3f5e70e839c3cb.,
>>  
>> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200068=4YF!YI,1537461904877.acb8f16a004a894c8706f6e12cd26144..
>>  Split took 0sec
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]: 2018-09-20 19:45:05,441 INFO  
>> [regionserver/prod013/10.0.0.13:60020-splits-1537400010677] 
>> regionserver.SplitRequest: Split transaction journal:
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         STARTED at 1537461904853
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         PREPARED at 1537461904877
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         BEFORE_PRE_SPLIT_HOOK at 
>> 1537461904877
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         AFTER_PRE_SPLIT_HOOK at 
>> 1537461904877
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         SET_SPLITTING at 1537461904880
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         CREATE_SPLIT_DIR at 
>> 1537461904987
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         CLOSED_PARENT_REGION at 
>> 1537461905002
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         OFFLINED_PARENT at 
>> 1537461905002
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         STARTED_REGION_A_CREATION at 
>> 1537461905056
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         STARTED_REGION_B_CREATION at 
>> 1537461905131
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         PONR at 1537461905192
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         OPENED_REGION_A at 
>> 1537461905249
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         OPENED_REGION_B at 
>> 1537461905252
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         BEFORE_POST_SPLIT_HOOK at 
>> 1537461905439
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         AFTER_POST_SPLIT_HOOK at 
>> 1537461905439
>> Sep 20 19:45:05 prod013 hbase[193055]:         COMPLETED at 1537461905439
>> 
>> Index update failed at prod002:
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,520 WARN  
>> [hconnection-0x4f3242a0-shared--pool32-t36014] client.AsyncProcess: #220, 
>> table=IDX_MARK_O, attempt=1/1 failed=1ops, last exception: 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.NotServingRegionException: Re
>> gion 
>> IDX_MARK_O,\x107834005168\x0000000046200020LWfBS4c,1536637905252.3e44b85ddf407da831dbb9a871496986.
>>  is not online on prod013,60020,1537304282885
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegionServer.getRegionByEncodedName(HRegionServer.java:3081)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.getRegion(RSRpcServices.java:1271)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2365)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:36621)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2359)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:124)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:297)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:277)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:  on prod013,60020,1537304282885, 
>> tracking started Thu Sep 20 20:09:24 MSK 2018; not retrying 1 - final failure
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,549 INFO  
>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] 
>> zookeeper.RecoverableZooKeeper: Process identifier=hconnection-0x39beae45 
>> connecting to ZooKeeper ensemble=10.0.0.1:2181,10.0.0.2:2181,10.0.0.3:2181
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,549 INFO  
>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] 
>> zookeeper.ZooKeeper: Initiating client connection, 
>> connectString=10.0.0.1:2181,10.0.0.2:2181,10.0.0.3:2181 sessionTimeout=90000 
>> watcher=org.apache.hadoop.hbase.zookeeper.PendingWatcher@3ef61f7
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,562 INFO  
>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020-SendThread(10.0.0.3:2181)]
>>  zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Opening socket connection to server 
>> 10.0.0.3/10.0.0.3:2181. Will not attempt to authenticate using SASL (unknown 
>> error)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,570 INFO  
>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020-SendThread(10.0.0.3:2181)]
>>  zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Socket connection established to 
>> 10.0.0.3/10.0.0.3:2181, initiating session
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,572 INFO  
>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020-SendThread(10.0.0.3:2181)]
>>  zookeeper.ClientCnxn: Session establishment complete on server 
>> 10.0.0.3/10.0.0.3:2181, sessionid = 0x30000e039e01c7f, negotiated timeout = 
>> 40000
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,628 INFO  
>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] 
>> index.PhoenixIndexFailurePolicy: Successfully update INDEX_DISABLE_TIMESTAMP 
>> for IDX_MARK_O due to an exception while writing updates. 
>> indexState=PENDING_DISABLE
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.exception.MultiIndexWriteFailureException:  
>> disableIndexOnFailure=true, Failed to write to multiple index tables: 
>> [IDX_MARK_O]
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.write(TrackingParallelWriterIndexCommitter.java:235)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.write(IndexWriter.java:195)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure(IndexWriter.java:156)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.write.IndexWriter.writeAndKillYourselfOnFailure(IndexWriter.java:145)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.doPostWithExceptions(Indexer.java:620)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.doPost(Indexer.java:595)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.phoenix.hbase.index.Indexer.postBatchMutateIndispensably(Indexer.java:578)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$37.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1048)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost$RegionOperation.call(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1711)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1789)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.execOperation(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1745)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RegionCoprocessorHost.postBatchMutateIndispensably(RegionCoprocessorHost.java:1044)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.doMiniBatchMutation(HRegion.java:3646)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:3108)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.HRegion.batchMutate(HRegion.java:3050)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doBatchOp(RSRpcServices.java:916)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.doNonAtomicRegionMutation(RSRpcServices.java:844)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.regionserver.RSRpcServices.multi(RSRpcServices.java:2405)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.protobuf.generated.ClientProtos$ClientService$2.callBlockingMethod(ClientProtos.java:36621)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcServer.call(RpcServer.java:2359)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:124)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:297)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]:         at 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.ipc.RpcExecutor$Handler.run(RpcExecutor.java:277)
>> Sep 20 20:09:24 prod002 hbase[97285]: 2018-09-20 20:09:24,632 INFO  
>> [RpcServer.default.FPBQ.Fifo.handler=98,queue=8,port=60020] 
>> util.IndexManagementUtil: Rethrowing 
>> org.apache.hadoop.hbase.DoNotRetryIOException: ERROR 1121 (XCL21): Write to 
>> the index failed.  disableIndexOnFailure=true, Failed to write to multiple 
>> index tables: [IDX_MARK_O] ,serverTimestamp=1537463364504,
>> 
>> 
>>> On 20 Sep 2018, at 21:01, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Our setup:
>>> HBase-1.4.7
>>> Phoenix-4.14-hbase-1.4
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 20 Sep 2018, at 20:19, Batyrshin Alexander <0x62...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>  Hello,
>>>> Looks live we got dead lock with repeating "ERROR 1120 (XCL20)" exception. 
>>>> At this time all indexes is ACTIVE.
>>>> Can you help to make deeper diagnose?
>>>> 
>>>> java.sql.SQLException: ERROR 1120 (XCL20): Writes to table blocked until 
>>>> index can be updated. tableName=TBL_MARK
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.exception.SQLExceptionCode$Factory$1.newException(SQLExceptionCode.java:494)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.exception.SQLExceptionInfo.buildException(SQLExceptionInfo.java:150)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.validateAndGetServerTimestamp(MutationState.java:815)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.validateAll(MutationState.java:789)
>>>>    at org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.send(MutationState.java:981)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.send(MutationState.java:1514)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.execute.MutationState.commit(MutationState.java:1337)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixConnection$3.call(PhoenixConnection.java:670)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixConnection$3.call(PhoenixConnection.java:666)
>>>>    at org.apache.phoenix.call.CallRunner.run(CallRunner.java:53)
>>>>    at 
>>>> org.apache.phoenix.jdbc.PhoenixConnection.commit(PhoenixConnection.java:666)
>>>>    at 
>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$doUpsert$1(PhoenixDao.scala:103)
>>>>    at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:209)
>>>>    at x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.doUpsert(PhoenixDao.scala:101)
>>>>    at 
>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$batchInsert$2(PhoenixDao.scala:45)
>>>>    at 
>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$batchInsert$2$adapted(PhoenixDao.scala:45)
>>>>    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.flatMap(Stream.scala:486)
>>>>    at 
>>>> scala.collection.immutable.Stream.$anonfun$flatMap$1(Stream.scala:494)
>>>>    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.$anonfun$append$1(Stream.scala:252)
>>>>    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1169)
>>>>    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream$Cons.tail(Stream.scala:1159)
>>>>    at scala.collection.immutable.Stream.length(Stream.scala:309)
>>>>    at scala.collection.SeqLike.size(SeqLike.scala:105)
>>>>    at scala.collection.SeqLike.size$(SeqLike.scala:105)
>>>>    at scala.collection.AbstractSeq.size(Seq.scala:41)
>>>>    at scala.collection.TraversableOnce.toArray(TraversableOnce.scala:285)
>>>>    at scala.collection.TraversableOnce.toArray$(TraversableOnce.scala:283)
>>>>    at scala.collection.AbstractTraversable.toArray(Traversable.scala:104)
>>>>    at 
>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$batchInsert$1(PhoenixDao.scala:45)
>>>>    at scala.util.Try$.apply(Try.scala:209)
>>>>    at x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.batchInsert(PhoenixDao.scala:45)
>>>>    at 
>>>> x.persistence.phoenix.PhoenixDao.$anonfun$insert$2(PhoenixDao.scala:35)
>>>>    at scala.concurrent.Future$.$anonfun$apply$1(Future.scala:655)
>>>>    at scala.util.Success.$anonfun$map$1(Try.scala:251)
>>>>    at scala.util.Success.map(Try.scala:209)
>>>>    at scala.concurrent.Future.$anonfun$map$1(Future.scala:289)
>>>>    at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise.liftedTree1$1(Promise.scala:29)
>>>>    at scala.concurrent.impl.Promise.$anonfun$transform$1(Promise.scala:29)
>>>>    at scala.concurrent.impl.CallbackRunnable.run(Promise.scala:60)
>>>>    at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
>>>>    at 
>>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
>>>>    at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 

Reply via email to